Baitullah, Pradhan, Gram ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary Of ...
Judges: A Kumar
04 May, 2006·1. This review application filed by the petitioner seeks to review my judgment dated 1.7.2005 whereby the writ petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed. Against the judgment, which is sought to be reviewed, petitioner has filed a Special Appeal bearing No. 858 of 2005 which has been dismissed ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sunil @ Suman Pasi, S/O Late ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
04 May, 2006·3. Hear Sri Raj nath Bhakta learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. 4. It is contended by the learned Counsel fort the applicant: I. That the alleged occurrence was not pre-intended. It has taken place in a sudden quarrel in which the applicant caused injures by using brick and ston...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sanjay Chaurasia Son Of Sharda ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Vimal ...
Judges: R Singh
04 May, 2006·4. The revisionist claimed himself to be juvenile under the provisions of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children,) Act, 2000, here-in-after referred to as 'Act. Thereafter he was declared juvenile on 26.5.2005 by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Court No. 2, Ghaziabad and the matter was refe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Uma Shankar Pandey Son Of Shiv ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
04 May, 2006·3. According to the prosecution version at the time of the alleged occurrence the deceased Om Narayan Pandey was going on his motorcycle from his house to village Shivrajpur for filling the oil. The first informant, riding on his motorcycle, was also going to Shankargarh Market, the witness Babloo w...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Prem Son Of Shyam Singh vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: R Singh
04 May, 2006·3. It is contended by the learned Counsel for the applicant; (i) That in the present case five persons were named as accused and specific allegations of causing injuries were made against them but during investigation the I.O. came to the conclusion that the co-accused Ompal @ Bhola, Jitendra @ Papp...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Parmanand Agrawal vs Arvind Kumar Gupta
Judges: A Kumar
04 May, 2006·2. The facts, as narrated in the writ petition, are that plaintiff filed a suit against the petitioner-defendant for recovery of a sum of Rs. 66,626 in the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) Budaun, which has been registered as Case No. 64 of 1998. As per the case set up by the plaintiff/contest...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.B. Singh S/O Shri P.N. Singh, Sr. ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through Its ...
Judges: V Sahai, S Yadav
04 May, 2006·(Emphasis supplied). 20. The same question was again examined in Hindustan Times Ltd. v. Their Workmen and the Court recorded its conclusion in following words in para 7 of the Report: While industrial adjudication will be happy to fix a wage structure which would give the workmen generally a living...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Saurabh Son Of Vijai Singh (In ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
04 May, 2006·3. Heard Sri Radhakrishna Yadav learned Counsel for the applicant; learned A.G.A. and Sri S.P. Rthore, learned Counsel for the complainant. 4. It is alleged by the learned Counsel for the applicant: - I. That there was no demand of dowry and the deceased was never subjected to cruelty to full fill t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bechchu Lal Son Of Late Guljari vs Ixth Additional District Judge, ...
Judges: S Khan
04 May, 2006·4. During pendency of writ petition both the original landlord as well as original tenant died. Landlord has been substituted by his widow who has stated that she requires the shop in dispute to settle her son Ghanshyam (for whose need also release application was filed by original landlord). It has...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jitendra Alias Jeetu Son Of Tej Pal ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
04 May, 2006·3. Heard Sri Gaurav Kakkar learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. 4. It is contended by the learned Counsel for the applicant: I. That there are material discrepancies in the F.I.R. and the statement of the witnesses. In the F.I.R, it was alleged that all the miscreants were armed ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.