Bhaiya Ajeet Singh Son Of Late ... vs State Of U.P. Through The ...
Judges: R Agrawal, S Misra
05 May, 2006·4. In the rejoinder affidavit the petitioner has reiterated that the petitioner and other Zamindars continue to be owners of Non-Z.A. land which has not been demarcated as agricultural land under the Act. The order dated 2.12.2003 has been said to have been passed for political motives. No records r...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Poonam Rani Wife Of Atul Kumar vs Dr. Naresh Chandra Son Of Banarsi ...
Judges: D Singh
05 May, 2006·It is alleged that the orders dated 15.7.1992 and 23.1.2004 passed by this Court has been violated. From a perusal of the petition, a prima facie case is made out. Issue notice to opposite parties within a week returnable within six weeks. The opposite party No. 1 shall be present on the next date. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Anwar Khan vs Harish Chandra And Ors.
Judges: S Mehrotra
05 May, 2006·4. On 24.1.2006, Sri Rajesh Dwivedi, holding brief for Sri Radhey Shyam, learned Counsel for the applicants in the aforementioned substitution application submitted that copy of the said application had been served on the learned Counsel appearing for the respondents in compliance with the direction...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Azeem Son Of Mohd. Rasheed vs State Of U.P. And Saddiq Son Of ...
Judges: K Sinha
05 May, 2006·2. The allegations set forth in the application are that the above noted trial was pending in the court of Special Judge (EC Act) Court No. 9m, Shahjahanpur, which was presided over by G.S. Chandel, who recorded the evidence of six witnesses. Thereafter Sri Chandel was posted in the court of Third A...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Javed Jameel vs Distt. Judge And Ors.
Judges: R Sharma
05 May, 2006·6. Against the aforesaid judgment and order of the prescribed authority, the petitioner preferred an appeal, which has also been dismissed by the learned District Judge, Lucknow, by writing a 18-page long judgment and order dated 15.9.2005. 7. Sri J.N. Pandey, learned Counsel for the petitioner has ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. vs Vishram Singh Raghubanshi, ...
Judges: I Murtaza, R Singh
05 May, 2006·Sri Suresh Chandra Jain, II Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate has reported that committing fraud in the court came under the purview of criminal contempt on the light of decision given by Hon'ble Supreme Court in various cases which are mentioned at portion marked 'B' in the office note dated 19.11.98...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandra Pal Son Of Nanuki Prasad ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: K Ojha
04 May, 2006·3. According to prosecution Smt. Nirmalawati lodged FIR against applicant on 3.9.2005 at 4.30 a.m. containing the fact that on 1.9.2005 at about 12.00 noon applicant Chandra Pal had beaten her husband Nathu Lai in respect of payment of wages. Nannu, Rampal, Devi Das, Mahendra Pal of her village had ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Haseen Ahmad Khan And Anr. vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: A Raham
04 May, 2006·4. Defendant contested the suit on the grounds inter alia that plaintiff has no concern with the disputed property nor is he in possession over the same. It has been also asserted that the plaintiff was never in possession over the disputed property. The defendant is the owner in possession over the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of C. Ex. vs Prism Cement Ltd.
Judges: S Harkauli, V C Misra
04 May, 2006·1. This is a Central Excise appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Only one question of law has been framed by the appellant namely, "whether refund can be sanctioned to the respondents without satisfying the requirement of principle of unjust enrichment". A perusal of the Tribuna...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ranju Chaturvedi Daughter Of Ram ... vs State Of U.P. Through Its ...
Judges: K Sinha
04 May, 2006·2. The present petition has been filed for quashing of the order dated 9.3.2006 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Mau and order dated 22.12.2005 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mau. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is owner of the vehicle bearing registration No. U.P.-5...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.