Laxmi Devi W/O Lallo vs State Of U.P., Rajesh And Santosh ...
Judges: R Rastogi
08 May, 2006·2. The facts relevant for disposal of this application are that on on 7.9.01 the applicant Smt. Laxmi Devi moved an application before the District Magistrate, Kaushambi alleging that she resides at village Khoya P.S. Sarai Akil District Kaushambi. Her daughter Seema Devi was a student of Class VIIt...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pappi @ Prem Singh Son Of Devi @ ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Rastogi
08 May, 2006·7. The above appeal was heard and decided by Sri Ashok Kumar Mathur, learned Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Court No. 1, Mathura vide his judgment dated 10.3.2005 whereby he dismissed the appeal & rejected the bail application. Thereafter the accused revisionist moved one more bail application bef...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
R.S. Negi vs Vishnu Sahai Verma And Anr.
Judges: P Srivastava
08 May, 2006·4. Sri M. A. Qadeer, advocate, has submitted that the tenancy was not determined by means of the notice and in absence of express assertion in the notice, the tenancy was not determined. It cannot be said that the landlord determined the tenancy and the suit was wrongly decreed in favour of the land...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Subhash Chandra Upadhyaya Son Of ... vs State Of U.P. Through The Director ...
Judges: R Agrawal, S Misra
08 May, 2006·(C) To award cost of petition in favour of petitioner. 2. According to the petitioner, he was appointed on the post of constable in Provincial Armed Constabulary (hereinafter referred to as "the PAC") in the State of U.P. His services were also confirmed on the said post. While posted in H Company o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sri Krishan Dass Goel S/O Late Shri ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh By And ...
Judges: V Misra
08 May, 2006·5. Since no counter affidavit was filed within time granted, this Court vide its order dated 25.7.2001 directed the State Government to consider the claim of the petitioner for condonation of his interruption of service and appropriate decision be taken within a period of three months. The petitione...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bata India Ltd. vs V Addl. Sessions Judge And 2 Ors.
Judges: S Khan
08 May, 2006·2. Property in dispute is a shop dimensions of which are approximately 27 feet (frontage) and 24 feet (depth). During arguments a sketch map of the shop in dispute was filed by learned Counsel for the landlady, substantial correctness of which was not denied by the learned Counsel for the tenant-pet...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
V.K. Jaiswal vs General Manager ...
Judges: S Srivastava
08 May, 2006·4. Before proceeding further, it would be useful to refer to Regulation 85 (1) of the U.P. Co-operative Societies Employees Regulations 1975 which envisages that the disciplinary proceedings against an employee shall be conducted by the Inquiring Officer referred to in clause (iv) with due observanc...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gopal Singh Son Of Sri Chandra ... vs State Of U.P. And Smt. Meenakshi ...
Judges: V Prasad
08 May, 2006·2. The factual matrix of the case as is perceptible from the complaint filed by Smt. Minakshi Devi, respondent No. 2, are that she was married on 9.12.2003 with Gopal Singh, applicant No. 1 at Rudra Prayag, Uttranchal. In the marriage, her parents had given adequate dowry to the applicant No. 1 and ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Om Prakash Jaiswal Alias Lalloo ... vs Shiv Narain Chaudhary (D) Through ...
Judges: P Krishna
05 May, 2006·Issue No. 7 : (Structural alterations under Sections 20(2)(b) and 20(2)(c) of the Act: 11. The finding under issue No. 7 to the effect that the defendant-tenant has constructed water tank etc. and is using chemical colours and has removed the Intervening walls and also constructed double decker roof...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ajai Kumar Kashyap vs District And Sessions Judge And ...
Judges: R Deepak
05 May, 2006·(c) the charge-sheet dated 28-7-2005 relating to the above criminal case No. 359 of 2005, and for releasing the petitioner-accused mainly on the grounds inter alia that there is non-compliance with the mandatory provisions of Sections 41, 42 & 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act, that there is nothing in the all...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.