Om Prakash Vishnoyee vs Ixth A.D.J. And Ors.
Judges: A Kumar
10 May, 2006·2. The brief facts of the present case are that respondent Smt. Shantl Devi is the landlord of the accommodation in question and the petitioner is tenant of duchhatti (mezzanine). The landlord has purchased the accommodation in question by registered sale deed in the year 1974 for residential purpos...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohammad Ayyub Siddiqui Son Of ... vs Committee Of Management, Abdul ...
Judges: R Tiwari
10 May, 2006·2. a writ, order or direction of suitable nature restraining the respondents from interfering in the functioning of the petitioners as the management of Abdul Karim Khan Inter College. Amroha, Jyotiba Phule Nagar. 3. a writ/writs, and/or to pass such other and further order as this Hon 'ble court ma...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raj Nath Singh Son Of Sri Kalp Nath ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ...
Judges: R Tiwari
10 May, 2006·5. It is alleged by the counsel for the petitioners that according to the byelaws of the society, the term of the office bearer of the society is three years. However, as per the provisions of the byelaws of the society, the general members of the society would elect office bearers of the society an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Nirmala Devi vs Ist A.D.J. And Ors.
Judges: U Pandey
10 May, 2006·2. The petitioner challenges the order of the trial court dated 10.2.2003 and also the order of the appellate court dated 23.3.2006 whereby petitioner's application under Order IX, Rule 13, C.P.C. for setting aside the ex parte decree dated 25.2.2000 has been dismissed. 3. The learned Counsel for th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kanhaiya Lal S/O Navjeewan Lal (In ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
09 May, 2006·3. Heard Sri Satish Trivedi learned Senior Advocate assisted by K.P. Singh learned Counsel for the applicant ' and learned A.G.A. and Sri Dharmendra Singh learned Counsel for the complainant. 4. It is contended by the learned Counsel for the applicant: - (i) That the alleged occurrence had taken pla...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Deo Son Of Chhote Lal, Kali ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...
Judges: A Lala, S Shanker
09 May, 2006·a. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to arrest the petitioners and refrain from taking any action revoking their orders of release under the Government Order dated 11,1.2000 to 25.1.2000. b. issue any other writ, order or direction which this Ho...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Sudama W/O Banwasi Lal Alias ... vs State Of U.P., Superintendent Of ...
Judges: I Murtaza, A Saran
09 May, 2006·18. The Registrar General of this Court shall send a copy of this order to the Chief Secretary, Principal Home Secretary and Principal Law Secretary U.P. forthwith who are requested to urgently take up the matter and do the needful for issuing the ordinance as suggested above. Presumption of in appr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shri Rajendra Kumar Sharma S/O ... vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...
Judges: A Tandon
09 May, 2006·5. Feeling aggrieved by the said order, petitioner filed an appeal under Rule 11 of the U.P. Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999. The appeal so filed by the petitioner has also been dismissed by the State Government by means of the order dated 23rd December, 2005. It is against th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Muzazir Husain S/O Mazarul Hasan ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
09 May, 2006·2. This is second bail application. Crl.Misc. I Bail Application No. 9592 of 2005 has been rejected by this Court on 15,9.2005, considering the case on its merit. 3. From the perusal of the record, it appears that in the present case there is embezzlement of a huge amount of Rs. 6, 12,842/- of Gram ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Bahal S/O Awadhi (In Jail) vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
09 May, 2006·3. Heard Sri Jagdish Singh Sengar and Sri Ajit Kumar Singh Solanki learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. and Sri A.K. Srivastava learned Counsel for the complainant. 4. It is contended by the learned Counsel for the applicant: - (i) That in the present case the presence of the first i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.