Vinita Singh D/O Tribhuwan Nath ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: A N Ray, A Bhushan
03 March, 2006·11. In so far as the fixation of a cut off date is concerned, we have no doubt, that generally speaking, a cut off date does not violate Article 14 simply because one person is distant from another by a single day. That might often happen, and that by itself is not discriminatory. The problem of dis...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Purusottam Giri Son Of Late Ummed ... vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation ...
Judges: S Srivastava
03 March, 2006·2. In connection with the above, it may be noticed that the High Court Rules were appropriately amended vide Notification NO. 450-VIII-C2 dated Sept 16, 2005 which was published in U.P. Gazette (Part II) dated 11.6.2005 by which new Rule 7A was added after Rule 2 of Chapter XXIV of the Rules of Cour...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandra Kant vs A.D.J. (Court No. 6) And Ors.
Judges: U Pandey
02 March, 2006·3. Counter-affidavit was filed on some earlier date on behalf of respondent No. 2. 4. This petition challenges the order dated 20.10.2005 restoring the suit after granting the delay condonation application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. 5. The learned Counsel contends that the suit was initi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Prabhu Dayal S/O Shri Bhagwandin vs State Of U.P. And Rupesh @ Khaji S/O ...
Judges: A Saran
02 March, 2006·2. A very short submission has been made in this case that as per the order of attachment of the disputed property under Section 14(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 12.10.2004 passed by the District Magistrate, Kanpur ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Surendra Singh Yadav Son Of Paltu ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through ...
Judges: D Gupta
02 March, 2006·9. The facts of this case reveal that a clear warning was contained in the Verification Roll that furnishing of false information or suppression of any factual information would be a disqualification likely to render the candidate unfit for employment under the Government and that if at a later stag...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shambhu Nath vs District Judge And Ors.
Judges: U Pandey
02 March, 2006·2. In this petition the order dated 21.2.2004, passed by the executing court and the other dated 30.1.2006, passed by the revisional court are under challenge. 3. A suit for specific performance of contract of the plaintiffs respondents was decreed by the trial court on 15.4.1978 and direction was g...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
G.C. Suri vs Captain N.R. Abbot And Ors.
Judges: U Pandey
02 March, 2006·2. This petition challenges the order dated 7.2.2006, passed by the revisional court and order dated 31.3.2005, passed by the trial court whereby the amendment application moved under Order VI, Rule 17, C.P.C. has been partly allowed and partly rejected. 3. The learned Counsel contends that in a sui...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Prabhu Dayal Son Of Baddri Prasad vs Regional Food Controller, Jhansi ...
Judges: D Gupta
02 March, 2006·9. learned Counsel for the petitioner also submitted that a copy of the enquiry report had not been supplied to the petitioner and, therefore, the dismissal order should be set aside and in support of his contention he placed reliance upon a decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Managing Dire...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Ji And Anr. vs Shyam Lal And Ors.
Judges: R Yadav
02 March, 2006·6. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioners that there was no objection raised during the consolidation proceedings either at the stage of field to field partal or under Section 9(2) of the said Act and since there was no objection and no dispute between the parties, the Assistant ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
P.E. Boyee Son Of E.M. Boyee vs I Additional District Judge (Shri ...
Judges: S Khan
02 March, 2006·3. In any case no purpose will be served by dismissing the writ petition and thereby permitting the revisional court to decide the revision after taking into consideration that additional evidence which was adduced but which is no more available on the file. 4. Through supplementary affidavit filed ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.