The Commissioner, Trade Tax vs S/S Paints India
Judges: R Kumar
06 March, 2006·1. Present revision under Section 11 of U.P. Trade Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as "Act") is directed against the order of Tribunal dated 14.10.1999 relating to the assessment year 1991-92. 2. Dealer/opposite party (hereinafter referred to as "Dealer") was engaged in the business of manufacture ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Khursheed Ahmad And Anr. vs Gulzar Ahmad And Ors.
Judges: U Pandey
06 March, 2006·3. Summons had been issued to the defendants for filing written statement and also fixing a date for framing issues. In pursuance to those summons, the defendants, who were major, had appeared and the father of the minor defendant had moved an application for his appointment as his guardian. The Cou...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nabbu @ Navab Son Of Babu Sakka vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: A Lala, S Shanker
06 March, 2006·6. Counsel for the petitioner contacted to respondent No. 2 about this requisition/production/'B' warrant then he informed to the counsel for the petitioner that aforementioned requisition/production/'B' warrants have been received by him. The petitioner furnished bail bonds and were accepted by the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Sushma Shukla Wife Of Mridul ... vs Joint Director Of Education And ...
Judges: D Singh
06 March, 2006·2. This petition is directed against an order dated 15.3.2002 by which the respondent No. 4 has been appointed as a lecturer in Sanskrit by promotion and also the consequential order dated 21.3.2002. 3. Surendra Nath Sen Balika Vidyalaya Inter College is a duly recognized and aided Intermediate init...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Damodar Sharma Son Of Sedhu Ram ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: V Prasad
06 March, 2006·1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. 2. As agreed between the parties, this application is being finally disposed off. The F.I.R. was filed by the applicant against the accused persons. In the said F.I.R., the final report was submitted by the police after investigat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Babu Ram S/O Chitti Lodhi (In Jail) vs State Of U.P.
Judges: I Murtaza, R Misra
06 March, 2006·1. Lacerated would on Rt. side of forehead 8 cm x 3 cm x Bone deep with fracture of under lying frontal bone. 2. L.W. on outer corner of Rt. eye. Vertical in direction 4 cm. X 2 cm x Bone deep with fracture of under lying bone. 3. L.W. on chin 2 1/2 cm x 2 cm x bone deep with fracture of under lying...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
President Shri Chaturbhuj Sharma ... vs Awadh Bihari Tiwari Alias Ram Babu ...
Judges: U Pandey
06 March, 2006·2. This petition challenges the order dated 6.5.2005, passed by the trial court and order dated 19.12.2005, passed by the revisional court. The respondent No. 1 filed a suit for declaration against the petitioners-defendants in which the plaintiff presented an application under Order XI, Rule 12, C....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Ujagar Yadava Son Of Late Sri ... vs The State Of U.P. Through The ...
Judges: V Misra
06 March, 2006·Chapter X-Rule 73. A Government servant who remains sent after the end of his leave is entitled to no leave-salary for the period of such absence, and that period will be debited against his leave account as though it were leave on half average pay, unless his leave is extended by the Government. Wi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam ... vs Arun Kumar Dubey S/O Shri Sankatha ...
Judges: S R Alam, S Agarwal
06 March, 2006·The counter affidavit may be filed within the aforesaid period or else charges may be framed after summoning the notices. However, one more opportunity is granted to the opposite party to comply with the order within a months. The office may be send copy of this order along with the notice fixing a ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiv Shanker Saxena Son Of Late Uma ... vs The State Of U.P. Through The ...
Judges: V Sahai, S Yadav
03 March, 2006·11. In this connection a reference can be made to Imperial Tobacco Co. Ltd. v. Its workmen wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court has held even if an employee refuses to participate in the inquiry the employer cannot straightway dismiss him but he must hold an exparte enquiry where the evidence must be led ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.