Ram Dev Son Of Aram Autar ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ...
Judges: M Jain, V Chaturvedi
09 March, 2006·2. The grounds of detention are contained in Annexure 2 to the writ petition. It is based on an incident dated 14.3.2005 occurring at 8 A.M. in Mohalla Ganga Darwaja, in town Kayamganj, District Farrukhabad, The report was lodged the same day at P.S. Kayamgaj, District Farrukhabad at 8.30 A.M. by Vi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Nath Son Of Late Shri Bhaggoo vs State Of U.P. Through Chief ...
Judges: S R Alam, S Agarwal
09 March, 2006·10. Before considering the aforesaid second issue, it would be appropriate to reproduce Fundamental Rule 56, as applicable in UP. Fundamental Rule 56, as it stands after its amendment in 1976, is reproduced as under: - 56.(a) Except as otherwise provided in other clauses of this rule, the date of co...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhagwana Singh And Ors. vs Gaon Sabha Village Paijaniya
Judges: U Pandey
09 March, 2006·1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. This petition challenges the order of trial court as well as the appellate court whereby the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2, C.P.C. has been rejected. 3. Learned counsel contends that the land in question...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Suman Bai Nirmale Widow Of ... vs Ist Additional District Judge And ...
Judges: S Khan
09 March, 2006·2. EXEMPTION FROM OPERATION OF ACT: (1) Nothing in this Act shall apply to- (a) any public building; or (b) any building belonging to or vested in a recognised educational institution, the whole or the income from which is utilised for the purposes of such institution; (o) "public building" means an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chhotey Lal S/O Parmanand vs State Of U.P. And Smt. Rati Basor ...
Judges: V Prasad
09 March, 2006·1. Heard Sri S.K. Dubey advocate holding brief of Sri B.N. Singh advocate , learned Counsel for the applicant, at a great length and the learned AGA on behalf of respondent State. 2. The applicant has prayed for quashing of proceeding of complaint case being complaint case No. 164 of 2005 Smt. Rati ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kamla Prasad Son Of Sunder Ram, ... vs The District Judge And Ors.
Judges: S Khan
09 March, 2006·4. In the writ petition counter affidavit was filed by Bhola Nath, to respondent No. 6 and in paragraph 1 of the said counter affidavit it was stated that he was doing Pairvi on behalf of other contesting respondents, including respondent No. 2 i.e. Lalloo, who died afterward. All the contesting res...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Shahid Son Of Abdul Ghafoor vs Additional District Judge, ...
Judges: S Khan
09 March, 2006·(i) Gopal Yadav v. Special Judge (Anti-Corruption)/Additional District and Sessions Judge, Varanasi and Ors. 2002 (1) A.R.C. 197 (ii) Sardar Amrik Singh v. IVth Additional District Juedge, Kanpur Nagar and Ors. (1996 (2) A.R.C. 188). 4. Cost of the suit, which naturally includes court fees, is requi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raja Ram And Ram Lagan Both Sons Of ... vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation ...
Judges: S Srivastava
09 March, 2006·4. I have heard learned Counsel for parties and have also been taken through the record. 5. Learned Counsel for the petitioners began his submission urging that Pachu contesting Opp. party who was one of the co-tenant also, had admitted to petitioners' possession over the property extending to about...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Suresh Rai Son Of Sri Sankatha Rai vs Assistant Regional Manager, U.P. ...
Judges: R Tiwari
09 March, 2006·7. Four separate departmental proceedings had been initiated against the petitioner at different points of time under the aforesaid Regulations. These departmental proceedings culminated into four different punishment orders- (a) Order dated 30.12.1992 passed for withholding the increments for four ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Commissioner, Trade Tax vs S/S Kanch Udyog Sahkari Samiti
Judges: R Kumar
09 March, 2006·Section 2 (c) "dealer" means any person who carries on in Uttar Pradesh (whether regularly or otherwise) the business of buying, selling, supplying or distributing goods directly or indirectly, for cash or deferred payment or for commission, remuneration or other valuable consideration and includes-...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.