Smt. Durgesh Sharma W/O Rajbir ... vs State Of U.P. And Rajesh Kumar ...
Judges: V Prasad
14 July, 2006·3. The police personnel smashed colour T.V., Fridge, VCD, double bed, scooter and wooden almirah belonging to the applicant. It was further alleged in the said application that the family members of the applicant were implicated in a false case when in reality they had not committed any offence. Sub...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandra Kishore And Anr. vs Ram Babu And Anr.
Judges: D Singh
14 July, 2006·5. When the matter was taken up by this Court on 8.3.2006, the opposite parties were directed to indicate the size of the shops constructed by them between 7.11.1992 to 10.11.1992. In response thereof a supplementary counter-affidavit was filed on 13.4.2006 giving the dimensions of the shop construc...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Om Sharma S/O Late Dr. Harivansh ... vs Rajesh Kumar Srivastava And Ors.
Judges: M Jain, K Mishra
14 July, 2006·2. We have heard Sri P.N. Saxena, learned Senior Advocate for the appellant and have carefully gone through the record. The background be taken note of. The impugned order came to be passed while monitoring the directions issued by the Supreme Court in the case of D.K. Joshi v. State of U.P. . The m...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
City Montessori School vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: P Kant, R Yadav
14 July, 2006·34. It may be noted that as in the case of the company, under Section 3(f)(vi) the prior approval to the acquisition is required if an acquisition is made for the purpose of providing land for carrying out, inter alia, any housing scheme sponsored by a Society registered under the Society Registrati...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jhinge Son Of Tulsi (In Jail) vs State Of U.P.
Judges: M Jain, V Chaturvedi
14 July, 2006·8. The prosecution produced six witnesses in support of its case. They were P.W. 1 Bhoja, the complainant, P.W. 2 Ram Charan, P.W.3 Km. Vinto, P.W. 4 Smt. Khargi, P.W. 5 S.I. Sri Sada Bahar Dwivedi and P.W. 6 Dr. G.C. Mishra P.W. 1 to P.W. 4 were the witnesses of fact, whereas P.W. 5 was the 1.0. an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P.S.R.T. Corpn. Ltd. vs Rajendra Prasad And Anr.
Judges: R Kumar
14 July, 2006·5. Heard Sri Ajay Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.K. Srivastava, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 1. 6. It may be mentioned here that this Court while entertaining the petition on 23.8.2003 stayed the operation of the impugned award dated 26.4.2002. 7. Learned Counsel for t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajesh Singh Son Of Shri Ram ... vs Labour Court, State Of Uttar ...
Judges: R Kumar
14 July, 2006·7. There is no dispute that the petitioner was a daily wager and was not a regular employee appointed against any post following the procedure contemplated, thus, petitioner has no right of regularization. Merely because the petitioner has worked for more than 240 days as claimed, he would not get r...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Madhya Pradesh State Through ... vs District Judge, Dinesh Chandra ...
Judges: A Tandon
14 July, 2006·ARTICLE 7: 1. The rule of each Covenanting State shall be entitled to full owner-ship and enjoyment of all private properties (as distinct from private properties) belonging to him on the date of his making over the administration of that State to the Raj Pramukh in pursuance of the Covenant. 2. If ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Karhal Education Society Through ... vs The Assistant Registrar, Firm ...
Judges: R Kumar
14 July, 2006·i) to approve the earlier proceedings; ii) to consider, the election of the college to be held on 27,08.2000: iii) to consider the application of management; iv) to consider the examination result of the college. v) Any other matter with the permission of the President. * that in the agenda of the m...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sarju Prasad vs Viiith Additional District Judge ...
Judges: R Sharma
14 July, 2006·7. Sri I. D. Shukla, holding brief of Sri S.K. Mehrotra, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent landlady has opposed this writ petition. He has submitted that the application for release under Section 21(1)(a) of the Act was filed by the landlady on several grounds which were duly appreciated ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.