Vijay Narain Shukla Son Of Shri ... vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh And The ...
Judges: D Singh
31 July, 2006·2. In pursuance of an advertisement in the daily newspaper dated 24.7.1997 inviting applications for appointment to the post of clerk in the Judgeship at Jaunpur, the petitioner applied in the reserved category of Ex. Army personnel and he also appeared in the written test. He was not selected and t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhanu Pratap Pandey Son Of Shri ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through The ...
Judges: B Sapru
31 July, 2006·4. The petitioner was charged with desertion on 8.11.01 for having left and deserted his duties without due permission and leave from the competent authority. A departmental enquiry was held against the petitioner on the following charges.: That No. 900240065 CT (Bug) Bhanu Pratap Pandey of A 123 BN...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Ganesh And Co.
Judges: R Agrawal, V Nath
31 July, 2006·4. The assessee is a firm carrying on business in grains, oils, etc., on own accounts as well as on "arhat". Its accounting year, for the assessment year 1974-75 ended on March 31, 1974. In respect of the said accounting year, the assessee earned arhat at the rate of 3 per cent, but in its accounts,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. Through Principal ... vs D.K. Khare S/O Late P.B. Khare And ...
Judges: A N Ray, A Bhushan
31 July, 2006·11. The appellants submit that thereafter something inexplicable happened overnight and on the 3rd of June, 1992 the impugned Government order was issued wherein pay hike was given to the Assistant Lecturers and the Assistant Lecturers alone. 12. It is not disputed that earlier representations had b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shri Yadgar Husain Son Of Taj Ali vs Jais Mohammad Son Of Nabi Jan And ...
Judges: S Mehrotra
31 July, 2006·5. Pursuant to the said order dated 3.3.2006, the Office submitted its Report dated 23.3.2006 to the effect that the learned Counsel for the applicants in the aforementioned Substitution Application had not taken requisite steps for issuance of notices to the defendants-respondents Nos. 1 and 2. 6. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhartiya Antar Rashtriya Byopari ... vs Jagat Estate And Ors.
Judges: P Krishna
28 July, 2006·10. Further reliance placed upon Firm Sita Ram Agrawal v. Har Nath , is misplaced one. in this case in spite of defect pointed out by the defendant in the trial court that the suit on behalf of unregistered Firm is not maintainable, no such application for withdrawal was filed before the trial court...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kanhaiya Lal Tiwari S/O Vishwa ... vs State Of U.P. And Arun Kumar S/O ...
Judges: A Saran
28 July, 2006·3. The allegations in the FIR dated 19.10.1995, lodged by the informant Arun Kumar were that in the year 1993 he had entered into an agreement with the applicant Kanhaiya Lal Tiwari for the sale of some property. The sale deed was to be executed in favour of the informant's son Sauhard Praveen. He t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Roop Chand Chauhan Son Of Kalam ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ...
Judges: T Agarwala
28 July, 2006·(1) Discharge, (2) Removal or Termination, (3) Demotion in grade, A (4)Reduction in employments. Principal or Headmaster would be competent to give above punishment to Fourth class employees. In case of punishment awarded by competent officer, the Fourth class employee may appeal to Management Commi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jai Prakash Agarwal Son Of Shyam ... vs State Of U.P., The Xth Additional ...
Judges: A Saran
28 July, 2006·3. It is contended by the learned Counsel for the applicants that the complaint has been lodged belatedly as admittedly the incident in question took place in 1988 and the complainant left for her parents house in the year 1989 and after nine years in the year 1998, the complaint had been lodged. 4....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Amar Zia And Ors. vs State Bank Of India
Judges: P Krishna
28 July, 2006·5. Heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record. in support of the revision learned Counsel for the applicants submitted that there was no waiver of notice by the plaintiff and, as such, the findings recorded otherwise by the court below is vitiated in law. It was further submitted t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.