Rafat Sher Khan Son Of Late Sher Ali ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ...
Judges: R Tiwari
20 January, 2006·3. The District Magistrate made recommendation in the case of the petitioner vide letter dated 28.10.2003 to respondent No. 2 for necessary direction in the matter of compassionate appointment to the petitioner which remained unactioned till date. 4. In the circumstances, the petitioner filed Civil ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sukhuwa Son Of Mahavir vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation ...
Judges: S Srivastava
20 January, 2006·6. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner urged that Plot No. 4224 was allotted to the petitioner who also acquired Bhumidhari rights on the land in dispute under the U.P.Z.A. & LR. Act. The land in dispute is a valuable land situated on the main road. On an app...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shariful Hasan Alias Foto Son Of ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: K Ojha
20 January, 2006·3. According to prosecution on receipt of information on 8.9.1984, V.S. Rana, the then Station Officer, police station Dilari, PW 1, alongwith police Sub Inspector C.S. Yadav, PW 2, Mustafa Ali PW 3, Khursheed PW 4 and other police personnel raided the house of the accused at about 7.30 A.M. in vill...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs Prem Kumar
Judges: A Yog, P Krishna
19 January, 2006·Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble ITAT was correct in law in deleting the addition of Rs. 1,13,500 made under Section 68 of the Act, being unexplained deposit, notwithstanding the fact that the capacity or the creditworthiness of the depositor remained unsubstant...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Pushpalata Maurya W/O Shri ... vs State Of U.P. Through The ...
Judges: A Sahi
19 January, 2006·2. The main thrust of the arguments of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is that the orders are without jurisdiction; that the orders have been passed without obtaining any approval of the Board; and that no final orders have been passed in view of the judgment of this Court on 6.2.2004 in writ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pradeep Kumar Son Of Late Shri Kade ... vs Bareilly Kshetriya Gramin Bank ...
Judges: R Tiwari
19 January, 2006·4. It appears from the record that the petitioner was also given a memorandum of a charge sheet levelling certain charges on 20.8.2003. The petitioner submitted his reply to this charge sheet. Thereafter the Enquiry Officer submitted inquiry report dated 3.3.2004 to the Disciplinary Authority/Chairm...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Yadu Nath Singh Son Of Shri ... vs State Of U.P. Through The Home ...
Judges: V Saran
19 January, 2006·Provided that a person who has in his possession more firearms than three at the commencement of the Arms (Amendment) Act, 1983, may retain with him any three of such firearms and shall deposit, Within ninety days from such commencement, the remaining firearms with the officer in charge of the neare...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ajay Pal Singh Son Of Late Brij Pal ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: S Agarwal
19 January, 2006·4. Learned Standing Counsel, however, submits that there is no error in the orders passed by the respondents and the petitioners is not entitled for claiming compassionate appointment under the Rules. 5. Heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record. The provisions pertaining to compa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Reva Enviro Systems (P) Limited vs State Of U.P. Through Its ...
Judges: A Yog, P Krishna
19 January, 2006·4. S/s. Assam Roadways (Delhi) v. State of U.P. and Ors. 2005 UPTC 1106. 11. The learned standing counsel in reply submitted that in absence of any specific direction, in the order of Tribunal to refund the amount of tax to the petitioner, the respondents, are justified in refusing to refund the amo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ajay Mishra Son Of Sri P.N. Mishra vs Director General Of Ordinance ...
Judges: S Agarwal
19 January, 2006·6. The contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is that in making the aforesaid selection no procedure has been followed and the entire selection is illegal, arbitrary and suffers from corrupt practices adopted by the respondents. It is also submitted that the selection has been finalize...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.