Ram Narayan S/O Baiznath vs Rakesh Tandon S/O Krishna Kant ...
Judges: S Kumar
25 January, 2006·The application is frivolous and misconceived. It contains several averments which cast doubt on the impartiality of this Court. However, there is no reason why this Court should not proceed to hear this case The application is rejected. Applicant to show cause why proceedings be not drawn against h...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Lal Son Of Sri Lakkhi And Mewa ... vs State
Judges: M Prasad
25 January, 2006·10. Next day, at about 5.00 p.m. accused Bankay Lal was arrested by the police. The Investigating Officer interrogated the accused. 11. PW 6 Dr. V.K. Gupta, the then Medical Officer of M.L.N. Hospital, Allahabad conducted autopsy oh the dead body of Onkar Nath Pandey on 19.10.1978 at 3.45 p.m. and f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The General Electric Company Of ... vs The Additional District Judge-V ...
Judges: B Sapru
25 January, 2006·5. Under the same notification Clause-5, it was provided that - YAH ADHESH AISI ABHIYANTHRAN EKAIYOM PAR LAGOO NAIHM HOGA, JO ABHIYANTHRAN UDYOG KE LIYA VATAN MANDAL KEE ANUSHASAVOM KE ANUSAR YA/UUSESE ADHIK VEDAN EVAM MEHANGAYEE BHATTA RAHIN HAI. 6. Such being the position, large body of the workme...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohan Dairy, A Registered ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through ...
Judges: R Kumar
25 January, 2006·That the assessment proceedings and consequential assessment order is without jurisdiction and barred by limitation in view of non service of statutory notice under Section 143 (2) within the period allowed as per proviso to Section 143 (2) of the Act. 3. The aforesaid ground was sought to be added ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Neera Yadav vs C.B.I. (Bharat Sangh)
Judges: S R Alam, S Ambwani, S Agarwal
25 January, 2006·Before adverting to the rival submissions it would be useful to have a glance over the necessary statutory provisions referred to by the learned Counsel for the parties as well as in the two opinions of the Hon'ble Judges, as contained in the statutes relevant in the present set of cases. Indian Pen...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Nisha Keserwani W/O Shri ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ...
Judges: V Saran
25 January, 2006·1. A sale deed was executed in favour of the petitioner on 4.5.1996 on which requisite stamp duty on the sale consideration had been paid. It has been submitted that after a gap of more than four years, a notice dated 4.7.2000 was issued by the District Magistrate, Allahabad to show cause why the sa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sahab Singh S/O Sri Hetram vs Commissioner Agra Region, ...
Judges: V Saran
25 January, 2006·1. The petitioner was granted an arms licence. On the basis of a report submitted by the police, on 19.8.2002, the petitioner was issued a show cause notice for cancellation of his [arms licence and his arms licence was also plated under suspension by the said order itself. The reply was submitted b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramjeet Bind And Jagdish Bind Both ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
25 January, 2006·(b) those whose land had been acquired partly; and I (c) those whose small part of the land had been acquired. 10. In view of the above, it simply provides for preference in employment depending upon the area of land acquired. 11. The Government Order dated 29th February, 1995 provides for a similar...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Badri Singh S/O Ram Autar Singh, ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: I Murtaza, A Saran
25 January, 2006·Injuries of Smt. Sheo Rani 1. Incised wound 6 cm x 1 cm x muscle deep on the left side of forearm. Clotted blood was present. Injuries of Smt. Duriee 1. Incised wound 2 cm x .5 cm x scalp deep on the left side of head, 5 cm above from the left ear. Clotted blood was present. 2. Incised wound 1 cm x ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhagwandeen S/O Ganga Ram vs State Of U.P., Through Special ...
Judges: V Saran
25 January, 2006·4. The submission of the petitioner is that while passing the impugned orders the authorities have neither considered the explanation of the petitioner submitted in response to the show cause notice nor have they taken into account the original Builty No. 802 dated 25.3.2003 which was filed by the p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.