Latoori Prasad S/O Pyare Lal, ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
04 January, 2006·2. Heard Sri A.B.L. Gaur, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Mai Prakash Pandey learned counsel for the revisionists and the learned A.G.A. 3. Learned counsel for the revisionists states that he do not want to press the revision on its merit. The present revision is being pressed on the quantum of sent...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dinesh Kumar Son Of Ram Swaroop vs State Of U.P., Through The ...
Judges: V Saran
03 January, 2006·2. I have heard Sri A.K. Aditya and Sri A.K. Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged between the parties and with the consent of the learned counsel ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Swami Nath And Ram Nath Sons Of Gopi ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
03 January, 2006·3. Learned counsel for the revisionists does not want to press this revision on its merit but it is being pressed on the quantum of sentence only. 4. To consider the quantum of sentence, it is necessary to consider the nature land gravity of the offence and sentence awarded by the trial court. 5. Th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Status Sanitech (P) Ltd. vs Asstt. Cit
Judges: R Agrawal, S Bala
03 January, 2006·1. We have heard Shri Rakesh Ranjan Agrawal, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri R.K. Upadhyaya, learned standing counselappearing for the respondents and have perused the writ petition, its Annexure as also the impugned order dated 6-12-2005 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals)-I, Agra, res...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Narayan Glass Works
Judges: R Agrawal, S Bala
03 January, 2006·Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee is entitled to claim investment allowance under Section 32A on an expenditure amounting to Rs. 2,23,415 as held by the Tribunal? 2. The reference relates to the asst. yr. 1978-79. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the pre...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramesh Chandra Sharma Son Of Late ... vs Punjab National Bank Through Its ...
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
03 January, 2006·4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that while enquiring the matter, the principles of natural justice had been violated inasmuch as proper opportunity had not been given to him. 5. We are unable to accept the aforesaid contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioner for the simple ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Sufal Saroj S/O Late Shri Baij ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: A Sahi
03 January, 2006·3. Leamed Counsel for the petitioner Sri D.K. Mishra contends that the petitioner has a legitimate expectation of receivirig the aforesaid benefits in view of the position taken by the State Government in its order order dated 29.8.2005, Annexure-3 to the writ petition. The said order was passed by ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anant Ram And Babu Ram Sons Of ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
03 January, 2006·3. It was also ordered that all the sentences shall run concurrently. It is reported by the C.J.M., Etawah vide his letters dated 5.11.1983 and 5-10,2005respectively that the revisionists Babu son of Jaisi Ram and Anant Ram have died, therefore, the revisions filed by them are abated. 4. Heard Sri D...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Amrit Banaspati Company Ltd. vs State Of U.P.
Judges: A Saran
03 January, 2006·2. The instant revision has been preferred against the judgment of the JM. Ghaziabad, dated 20.6.1986 in Case No. 437 of 1985, whereby the objection of the applicant has been overruled and the prosecution has been permitted to withdraw certain papers find documents as the complaint in another Case N...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sanjay Paper And Chemical ... vs District Judge And Ors.
Judges: V Saran
02 January, 2006·2. Against the order dated 27.8.2003, passed in the Second Suit No. 518 of 2003 by which merely notices to the defendant (petitioner herein) had been issued fixing 26.9.2003, the respondent No. 3 filed Revision No. 143 of 2003 before the District Judge, Gorakhpur, respondent No. 1. The said revision...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.