The Commissioner, Trade Tax vs Adhunik Electricals
Judges: R Kumar
21 February, 2006·4. Learned Standing Counsel submitted that the business was started in the month of November, 1996 and the assessment was for the period of five months and therefore, the provision of Section 18(2) of the Act was applicable and the provision of Section 3(2) of the Act does not apply and the turnover...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Krishan Pal S/O Jagveer Singh, ... vs State Of U.P. And Anil Kumar S/O ...
Judges: V Prasad
21 February, 2006·2. The applicants are aggrieved by the order of transfer dated 24.1.2006 passed by the Sessions Judge, Muzaffarnagar in Criminal Misc. Transfer Application No. 14 of 2006, Anil v. State of U.P. transferring the Session Trial No. 929 of 2002 as well as connected S.T. Nos. 928, 930 and 931 of 2002 to ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. vs Irfan Son Of Late Fayyaz Hussain ...
Judges: M Jain, V Chaturvedi
21 February, 2006·2. No report or complaint regarding the demand of dowry was made, hence the prosecution failed to prove beyond doubt the facturn of demand of dowry. 3. No report was lodged or complaint made regarding cruelty practised by the accused upon the deceased Reshma, hence the prosecution failed to prove cr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nishant Kaushik Son Of Shri Late ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through ...
Judges: A Tandon
21 February, 2006·4. learned Counsel for the petitioner states that by means of the impugned order dated 29th July, 2004 application of the petitioner has been again rejected by the authority, on clear misreading of the directions issued by this Court vide judgment and order dated 25th February, 2002. Hence the prese...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Arvind Kumar Son Of Shri Onkar Nath vs The Director, Rajya Krishi ...
Judges: A Yog, P Krishna
21 February, 2006·1. Heard Shri Mahesh Gautam, Advocate, on behalf of the petitioner-appellant in the intercourt special appeal before us arising from judgment and order dated 2.4.1999 passed by Learned Single Judge in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 12200 of 1999 : Arvind Kumar v. The Director, Rajya Krishi Utpadan Ma...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Rahman, Wali Mohammad And ... vs Special Judge (E.C. Act), Judge ...
Judges: S Khan
20 February, 2006·2. After remand the trial court held that even though building was constructed in the year 1969, however it was assessed for the first time for the purposes of house tax on 1.4.1970 hence that would be the date of first hearing. In respect of default trial court held that even before the notice date...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Narendra Bahadur Singh S/O Sri ... vs State Of U.P., District ...
Judges: V Saran
20 February, 2006·2. I have heard Sri Birendra Pratap Singh, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged between the parties and with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parries, this writ p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jitendra Kumar Son Of Lalai Ram vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ...
Judges: A Tandon
20 February, 2006·4. By means of order dated 15th October, 2004, Superintending Engineer, Ban Sagar Nagar Nirman, Allahabad (respondent No. 3) rejected the representation so made by the petitioner on the ground that under the U.P. Procedure for Direct Recruitment for Group 'C' Posts (outside the purview of U.P. Publi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Regional Manager, State Bank ... vs The Presiding Officer, Central ...
Judges: B Sapru
20 February, 2006·7. His second argument also arises from the first argument and he argues that it was not within the scope of reference made to the industrial tribunal to go into the question of existence of vacancies. His third argument is that the findings recorded by the Labour Court on "unfair labour practice" i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Prathvi Raj Chauhan Son Of Late ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: D Singh
20 February, 2006·2. The Counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press this petition on behalf of petitioner no."2 who has already been promoted and as such he is permitted to delete his name from the array of parties. 3. The petitioner is a Sub Inspector in the Civil Police and while posted at Pil...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.