Krishna Kumar @ Pappu S/O Late Sri ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: I Murtaza, V K Verma
15 December, 2006·c) Deep burn on left hand, which was found absent. d) Left forearm was burnt in middle. e) Deep burn on abdomen, lower and upper extremities. Death was caused due to anti-mortem burn injuries. 9. Postmortem of the dead body of Smt. Chaina Devi was also conducted by Dr. Kripal Singh (P.W.6) on 17.12....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramashray Son Of Sri Bhullan vs State Of U.P., Additional Session ...
Judges: P Srivastav
15 December, 2006·1. Heard Sri Arvind Srivastava, learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The order passed by the learned Additional Session Judge (Fast Track Court No. 2) Mahrajganj dated 24.11.2006 summoning the petitioner under Section 319 Cr.P.C. is impugned in the instant writ pet...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sanjay Kumar Pathak Son Of Sri ... vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ...
Judges: A Lala, V Misra
15 December, 2006·27. According to Rule 4(m), the year of recruitment means a period of twelve months commencing from the first day of July of the calendar year in which the process of recruitment is initiated by the Appointing Authority. The Appointing Authority within the meaning of the Rules means the Governor of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: vs Nakshatra Pal Singh, Advocate ...
Judges: I Murtaza, A Saran
15 December, 2006·3. Thereafter, on the orders of the Administrative Judge dated 14.7.2005, before whom the file along with the comments of the District Judge and Registry were placed, the criminal contempt was referred to the Bench hearing criminal contempt matters. An order was passed on 11.8.2005 by a Division Ben...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shri Kant Mishra S/O Sri Nathuni ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: S Srivastava
15 December, 2006·3. From the materials on record, it transpires that according to the directions contained in the judgment of the Apex Court in University of Kerala v. Council, Principals', Colleges, Kerala and Ors., Deen Dayal Upadhyay Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur has framed Ordinance and in accordance with the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Pramod Kumar Maheshwari
Judges: R Agrawal, V Nath
14 December, 2006·Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the hon'ble Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the conditions laid down in Explanation 5(2) to Section 271(1)(c) were fulfilled and no penalty was leviable under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961? The re...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shripal Bhati S/O Late Sh. Munshi ... vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ...
Judges: A Lala, V Misra
14 December, 2006·ii) issue a writ, order of direction in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to give effect to the impugned order dated 02.06.2006 during the pendency of the present petition; iii) issue any other writ, order or direction that this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs Deepchand Naresh Chand
Judges: R Agrawal, V Nath
14 December, 2006·2. The reference relates to the assessment year 1986-87. 3. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present reference are as follows: 4. The deduction claimed by the assessee on account of rent included an amount of Rs. 31,200 paid for premises used as a guest house. This amount was disallowed ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pravesh Son Of Swaminath And Vinay ... vs State Of U.P. And Dinesh Chandra ...
Judges: R Rastogi
14 December, 2006·3. Heard learned Counsel for the applicants and the learned A.G.A. for the State. 4. The learned Counsel for the applicants made only one submission before me. He submitted that offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 I.P.C. are non-cognizable so in view of the explanation to Section 2(d) Cr.P.C. t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jayanta Bandhopadhyay Son Of Late ... vs U.P. Power Corporation Limited ...
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
14 December, 2006·2. We have heard Shri V.K. Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Shri R.D. Khare, learned Counsel for respondent. 3. The learned Tribunal has only been addressed to the effect that of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, and it appears that the learned Counsel appearing before the learned Tribu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.