Lal Mani Prasad S/O Sri Jhagru ... vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ...
Judges: A N Ray, A Bhushan
19 December, 2006·5. The basic case of the petitioner is that the respondent is a Godia and therefore he is of different caste and cannot be of the caste Majhwar. 6. The respondent has had certificates issued in his favour declaring him to be a Majhwar and there is one such certificate from the Tahsildar in 1971 and ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Munna Alias Teerthraj S/O Sri ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: B A Zaidi
18 December, 2006·6-10-6%& okn is'kA vfHk;qDr eqUuk mQZ rhFkZjkt iqdkj ij vuqifLFkr gS tcfd lk{kh MkDVj jhrk cuZoky U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gSA vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ld vkosnu gkftjh ekQh dk izLrqr fd;k x;k gS ftlesa vuqifLFkr jgus dk dksbZ dkj.k ugha nf'kZr fd;k x;k gSA lk{kh ds U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr vkus ij U;k;ky; ds deZp...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. D.C. Srivastava vs Director Of Income-Tax ...
Judges: U Dhaon, S Jain
18 December, 2006·We have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. It is the admitted case of the parties that on 21 -2-2006 the petitioner was to travel from Lucknow to Delhi by Sahara Flight No. S2-6138, which was cancelled, and thereafter the petitioner pu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sabir S/O Gulsher (In Jail) vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
18 December, 2006·4. Heard Sri J.S. Sengar, learned Counsel for the applicant and Sri Ajeet Kumar Singh Solanki, learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. 5. It is contended by the learned Counsel for the applicant that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. There is no direct eye witness account bec...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ranjan Son Of Sri Raj Kumar ... vs State Of U.P. And Hem Raj Mishra Son ...
Judges: B A Zaidi
18 December, 2006·2. The applicant whose name is Rajan says that he has nothing to do with the matter, his father's name and address had not been given in the complaint and his arraignment is a case of mistaken identity, and reference, has also been made to the fact that it has been mentioned by the complainant in hi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Harpyari Wife Of Kedari ... vs State Of U.P. And Natthu Singh Son ...
Judges: R Rastogi
18 December, 2006·4. On the basis of the above report police registered case crime No. 63941030042 of 2003 against the above named Ganga Singh, Jaiman Singh, Mohkam Singh and Gopali under Sections 302 and 201 I.P.C. and after completion of investigation, charge sheet was submitted against them under Sections 302 and ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Suddhu Son Of Sri Gulab And Gulab ... vs The Union Of India (Uoi) Through ...
Judges: D Singh
18 December, 2006·3. The Food Corporation of India, which is an instrumentality of the State framed a scheme and issued a circular dated 3.7.1996 relating to compassionate appointment of the dependents of deceased and retired handling labourers. The scheme which is annexed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition, stipulat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Soni Devi Widow Of Late Ram Raj vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: V Prasad
18 December, 2006·1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. 2. The application of the victim Smt. Soni Devi who is the widow of Ram Raj employed in I.T.I, did disclosed commission of cognizable offence as the widow was cheated to a tune of Rs. 2,45,701/-. The Magistrate committed a manifest er...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. Through Secretary ... vs Vijay Prakash Bajpai Son Of Ram ...
Judges: A Lala, V Misra
15 December, 2006·6. Importance of the merit and genuinely are also guiding factors for the Court to determine the necessity of condonation of delay. 7. Against this background, let us now look to individual cases one after another to come to the appropriate conclusions. Special Appeal No. (158) of 2001 Special Appea...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Suraj Singh Son Of Sri Babu Ram vs The State Of U.P. Through ...
Judges: B Sapru
15 December, 2006·5. As soon as the order of conviction was passed by the trial Court, the petitioner was dismissed from service on 28.5.1990 by the Commandant 28 Battalion P.A.C. Etawah. The order of dismissal dated 28.5.1990 is appended as Annexure 1 to the writ petition and it records in para 3 that pursuant to th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.