Cantonment Board vs Smt. Sudarshan Mala Jain And Anr.
Judges: D Singh
25 August, 2006·12. Again in paragraph No. 14 it was stated that: As stated above, the answering respondents are not raising any new constructions, only renovation was being done by them. As such there was no question of getting any map sanctioned from the applicant. The false report has been submitted by Mr. Yadav...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nand Kishore Awasthi vs A.D.J., Court No. 16 And Ors.
Judges: A Kumar
25 August, 2006·1. The short point that has been advanced by Sri Manoj Misra, learned Counsel for the petitioner is that the appellate authority as well as the prescribed authority while dealing with the application filed by the contesting respondent-landlord under Section 21 (1) of U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 has not ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Buddhu And Ors. vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation ...
Judges: P Srivastava
25 August, 2006·2. The dispute relates to Khata No. 218 consisting of plot Nos. 31, 36, 237, 407 and 436 of village Ikbara, Pargana Hastinapur, District Meerut. According to the facts disclosed in the writ petition, in the basic year Khatauni, the name of contesting respondent No. 2 was recorded in column No. 8 and...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Kesar Devi And Ors. vs A.D.J. And Ors.
Judges: R Tiwari
24 August, 2006·8. In pursuance of the remand order dated 21.4.1994, the matter again came up before the prescribed authority. The prescribed authority on remand again allowed the release application on 31.3.1998 on the ground of comparative hardships in favour of respondent No. 3. Aggrieved by the order the petiti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Km. Krishna Daughter Of Bhikam ... vs State Of U.P. Through Its ...
Judges: S Srivastava
24 August, 2006·2. I have heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and also learned Standing counsel representing the respondent No. 4. I have also heard learned Standing counsel appearing for the State authorities. 3. The facts draped in brevity are that the petitioners having completed their 5th standard in the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pateshwari Electrical And ... vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: R Agrawal, V Nath
24 August, 2006·2. The reference relates to the assessment years 1983-85, 1984-85 and 1985-86. 3. Briefly stated the facts giving rise of the present reference in so far as the first question is concerned are as follows: The applicant was running generation and distribution of electricity and its assets were taken ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gandhian Institute Of Studies, A ... vs 4Th Additional District Judge And ...
Judges: V Shukla
24 August, 2006·State Amendments - [Uttar Pradesh]- In its application to the State of Uttar Pradesh, in Section 13, for the words "chief building of the society" substitute "registered office of the society-Uttar Pradesh Act 52 of 1975, Section 7(w.e.f. 10.10.1975). 13-A. Power of Registrar to apply for dissolutio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shri Pateshwari Electrical And ... vs Commissioner Of Income Tax
Judges: R Agrawal, V Nath
24 August, 2006·2. The reference relates to the asst. yrs. 1983-84, 1984-85 and 1985-86. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise of the present reference insofar as the first question is concerned are as follows: The applicant was running generation and distribution of electricity and its assets were taken over in th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Balveer And Radhey Shyam Both Are ... vs State Of U.P. And Dinesh Son Of ...
Judges: V Chaturvedi
24 August, 2006·Procedure when investigation cannot be completed In twenty four hours. 167. (1) Whenever any person is arrested and detained in custody, and it appears that the investigation cannot be completed within the period of twenty-four hours fixed by Section 57, and thee are grounds for believing that the a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nanhey Shukla Alias Dileep Shukla ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: V Prasad
24 August, 2006·2. It is contended by the learned Counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. He contended that in this case no body was named in the FIR lodged by the informant Ajai Shankar Shukla. In the said FIR he has mentioned that there was a single accused who shot ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.