Shyam Bahadur Singh @ Khanna Son Of ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
08 August, 2006·2. This application has been filed by the applicant Shyam Bahadur Singh alias Khanna with a prayer that he may be released on bail in case crime No. 172 of 2005, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, and 302 I.P.C. and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, P.S. Chaubeypur, District Varanasi. 3. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pravin Pandit S/O Budh Prakash (In ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
08 August, 2006·2. This application has been filed by the applicant Praveen Pandit with a prayer that he may be released on bail in case crime No. 438 of 2005, under Section 302 I.P.C., P.S. Civil Lines, District Meerut. 3. The prosecution story of this case, in brief, is that the F.I.R. has been lodged by Sri Dr. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dharam Vir Singh S/O Late Sri ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
08 August, 2006·1. Heard Sri D.N. Wali, learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P. 2. The prosecution story, in brief, is that the First Information Report of this incase has been lodged by Sehdev Bhati at Police Station Sikandrabad on 20.11.2005 at 11.05 A.M. in respect of the incid...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pawan S/O Sujan (In Jail) vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
08 August, 2006·2. This application has been filed by the applicant in with a prayer that he may be released on bail in case crime No. 219 of 2005, under Sections 147, 302, 307 I.P.C., P.S. Sadabad, District Hathras. 3. The prosecution story of this case, in brief, is that the F.I.R. of this case has been lodged by...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chairman U.P. Co-Operative ... vs Amar Nath Dwivedi Son Of Shri Awadh ...
Judges: A N Ray, A Bhushan
08 August, 2006·8. The reasons why there can be no two opinions about the employment of the writ petitioner being regular and front door as many-fold. The process of employment started with an All India advertisement; a copy of the English advertisement, which was seen by the writ petitioner, then working at Gujara...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gulavardhwaj Singh Son Of Jagdish ... vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh And Shri ...
Judges: S Shanker
08 August, 2006·4. After commitment of the case to the Court of Sessions, an application on behalf of the accused persons has been moved for discharging them under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The said application was rejected. Feeling aggrieved by it, this revision has been preferred in this Cour...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Balveer Prasad S/O Sri Pitamber vs The State Of U.P., Mahesh Chandra ...
Judges: S Shanker
08 August, 2006·4. The application was moved on behalf of the revisionist and time was taken to show the case law after lunch. No case law regarding permission to compromise in the case was produced. Thereafter, it was rejected on the ground that the offence under Section 307, I.P.C. is not compoundable under Secti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs Vijay Constructions
Judges: P Kant, B Agarwal
08 August, 2006·7. So far as the second question is concerned, lot of arguments have been advanced by Sri D.D. Chopra that in a matter of best judgment assessment, namely, where the books of account have been rejected, the provisions of Section 40(b)(iv) and (v) would not be available to the assessee and he would n...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Bhuri Wife Of Late Riyazuddin ... vs Smt. Shobha Rani Wife Of Kashinath ...
Judges: U Pandey
08 August, 2006·1. Heard Sri S.K. Varma, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Siddhartha Varma for the revisionists and Sri A. B. Saran, learned Senior Advocate for the respondents. 2. The order under challenge in this revision is passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal whereby it has been directed that before ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Tara Devi Wife Of Shri Shobh ... vs Dr. G. Raj Shekhar Son Of Shri A.H. ...
Judges: S Ambwani
08 August, 2006·6. The trial court framed the issues to the effect whether the land was kept apart for the purposes of park; whether defendant No. 1 has divested herself from the ownership therein; whether the suit is barred by Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act; whether defendant Nos. 3 and 4 are protected unde...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.