Ram Shankar Shukla (D) By Lrs. vs Ganesh Sewa Ashram Sanstha
Judges: P Krishna
04 April, 2006·5. The suit has been decreed by both the Courts below and feeling aggrieved the present appeal has been filed. 6. Although in the memo of appeal number of questions of law have been proposed but shri M.D. Singh, Advocate, has submitted only the following two legal propositions for the admission of t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiv Narain S/O Sri Kallu Ram And ... vs State Of U.P. Through The Home ...
Judges: A Lala, S Shanker
04 April, 2006·2. Upon hearing learned Counsel appearing for the parties, we have come to know that the dispute is with regard to notification issued by the Kanpur Development Authority (hereinafter referred as K.D.A.) for acquiring the land of the petitioners following the notifications originally issued by the S...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhupendra Singh Son Of Ranvir ... vs State Of U.P. And Anil Kumar Son Of ...
Judges: V Prasad
04 April, 2006·1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. 2. The applicant has challenged the proceeding of a charge sheet under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307 I.P.C., case crime No. 124 of 2005, police station Kotwali City, district Etah, pending in the court of C.J.M., Etah. 3. The learn...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ishwar Dutt Dwivedi vs Awas Evam Vikas Parishad And Ors.
Judges: P Kant, R Sharma
04 April, 2006·4. The petitioner's case is that though he had deposited the entire instalments as per the brochure, but the Parishad delayed the construction of the house for no valid reason and, therefore, the demand of additional cost was wholly arbitrary, illegal and without any basis, not flowing from the term...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sukh Deo Son Of Malloo And Sant Raj ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: K Sinha
04 April, 2006·1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. and perused the order dated 31.1.2005 passed by the Magistrate, who after perusing the final report, summoned the accused on the basis of evidence collected by the investigating officer. 2. The petitioners were summoned under Sections 307/...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Tulsi Ram Son Of Sri Jodha Singh vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: R Tiwari
04 April, 2006·5. The short question for determination before this Court is whether the retiral dues of the petitioner are liable to be reduced deducted particularly in view of the fact that he has completed his service and has retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.10.2004? 6. It is urg...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raj Dhar And Ors. vs Additional Commissioner ...
Judges: S Srivastava
04 April, 2006·2. The matter relates to mutation on the death of Sunri. 3. It transpires from the record that on the basis of an ex parte report submitted by Revenue Inspector/Supervisor Kanungo, petitioners' names were entered into revenue records in exercise of power under Section 33-A of the U.P. Land Revenue A...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Poornima Wife Of Rajendra And ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: G Srivastva
04 April, 2006·2. According to the prosecution case on 25.10.2005 one Ajit Singh, Chairman, Swayam Sevi Sanstha Guria) received an information from his wife Smt. Santwanta Manju that in red light area of Shivdaspur some minor girls are detained by Rahmat, Tulsi and Lalloo. They induced the minor girls for the purp...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
East India Transport Agency, ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...
Judges: A Tandon
03 April, 2006·6. Amendment of Section 32.-- In Section 32 of the principal Act, for Sub-section(1), the following sub-section shall be substituted, namely: (1) Subject to the provisions of Sub-section (3), the fee payable on a memorandum of appeal or other application under this Act filed or moved on or after the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. (Smt.) Santwana Dwivedi vs The State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: P Kant, R Sharma
03 April, 2006·2. It cannot be disputed that in a selection where a large number of forms are received from prospective candidates possessing minimum or essential prescribed qualification, the selecting body has a right to screen out the candidates, or in other words, to short list the candidates for consideration...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.