Bankey Lal vs Jamvant
Judges: A Kumar
12 April, 2006·3. The petitioner-tenant contested the aforesaid release application before the prescribed authority. The prescribed authority vide its order dated 14th May, 2003, allowed the application filed by the respondent-landlord and directed release of the accommodation in dispute in favour of the landlord....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd Sajid Ansari S/O Sri Mohd. ... vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ...
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
10 April, 2006·8. In Mohd Ibrahim v. The State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Madras , the Apex Court has considered the provisions corresponding to the above referred - to in the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (hereinafter called "the Old Act") and observed as under: The combined effect of Section 63, 63-A, 63-B and 63-...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vijay Yadav S/O Mathura Prasad ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: G Srivastva
10 April, 2006·1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. 2. It is alleged that the applicants committed rape upon two victims who were working as labourers and living in the house of one Satvendra Mehta. The rape was committed by entering into their room at the point of pistol and knife. 3. It...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Central Bureau Of Investigation vs Shri Arun Kumar Kaushik S/O Shri ...
Judges: V Prasad
10 April, 2006·7.9.05 3. The said application filed by C.B.I. was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge C.B.I. Prevention of Corruption Act U.P. East, Ghaziabad vide his impugned order dated 5.10.05 annexure No. 1 to this application. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the C.B.I. has filed the pre...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Krishna Kumar And Jai Prakash ... vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ...
Judges: A Yog, P Krishna
10 April, 2006·For the purposes of this section and of Section 22, "assessing authority " means the officer or authority who passed the earlier assessment order, if any, and includes the officer or authority having jurisdiction for the time being to assess the dealer. Explanation III: Notwithstanding the issuance ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anil Gupta S/O Late R.C. Gupta vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ...
Judges: K Sinha
10 April, 2006·1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. and perused the order passed by the Magistrate and also that of the revisional court. 2. The petitioner moved an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. for registration of the case and investigation for robbery and other sections of the I...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Suresh S/O Prathawi Ram And Ors. vs The State Of U.P. And Sri Charan ...
Judges: V Prasad
10 April, 2006·2. The factual background of the case are that a FIR was lodged by Charan Singh at police station Islam Nagar district Badaun on 28.5.2004 against the present applicants under Sections 147, 323, 324, 504 and 506 IPC in respect of an incident alleged to have taken place on 28.5.2004 at 1 P.M. with th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. State Road Transport ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh, Presiding ...
Judges: B Sapru
10 April, 2006·4. First argument as raised by learned Counsel for the petitioner is that the finding of the Labour Court in its award that the domestic enquiry club by the petitioner was bad and violative of the rules of natural justice is perverse and illegal on account of the fact the enquiry report itself recor...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Navyug Supplies Proprietorship ... vs Commissioner Of Trade Tax
Judges: A Tandon
10 April, 2006·5. It is not in dispute that the raw materials so purchased by the Assessee-firm was to be utilized for manufacture of exempted goods. In the normal course of business, Assessee-firm purchased iron and steel from the Steel Authority of India Ltd. (For short SAIL) and for the purposes of availing ben...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Munna Lal Patel @ Ravindra Kumar ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: G Srivastva
10 April, 2006·JUDGMENT G.P. Srivastva, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. 2. It is alleged that the applicant has committed rape upon a minor girl aged about 17 years. The rape was committed by the applicant and co-accused Kailash at the point of knife. The co-accused was apprehende...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.