Ram Singhasan Thakur vs The Union Of India (Uoi)
Judges: A Lala, S Misra
23 September, 2005·(b) It is not only duties of the respective parties to make applications and prove their claims but the authorities are also bound to find out eligible candidates out of their own for having pension by forming appropriate machinery for the same so that at least one real freedom fighter or their fami...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: Parasrampuria Trading And ... vs Unknown
Judges: S Ambwani
23 September, 2005·6. Sri Navin Sinha has relied upon Official Liquidator v. Raghawa Desikachar , in which it was held in para. 7 as follows (page 142) : 7. The above proceedings clearly show that no opportunity was given to respondents Nos. 1 to 4 because proceedings of January 12, 1958, show that as soon as written ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Regional Manager, Bank Of India vs Presiding Officer, Central ...
Judges: D Singh
23 September, 2005·4. The respondent workman was employed as a Special Assistant in the Sandila Branch of the petitioner bank, which is a Public Sector Bank. On the detection of a fraud, he was placed under suspension on 16.4.1988 and after a fact finding enquiry, a full fledged disciplinary proceedings were initiated...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Om Prakash Son Of Mansa Ram (In ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: I Murtaza, A Saran
23 September, 2005·2. Incised wound 20 cm x 5 cm x bone deep level vertebral column. 7.5 cm below injury No. 1. The larynx at lower part & pharynx at lower most part & carotid & jugular blood, vessels are also cut this level. 3. Incised wound 11 cm x 1 cm x bone deep present obliquely fore head from inner end of end o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Committee Of Management, Bal ... vs Assistant Registrar, Firms, ...
Judges: D Singh
23 September, 2005·5. The third writ petition No. 12778 of 2003 has been filed through Sri Jai Govind against an order dated 28.2.2003 whereby the Assistant Registrar has refused to decide his claim of election dated 15.12.2002 in view of the pendency of the earlier writ petition. However, in view of an interim order ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Komal Prakash, Formerly ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...
Judges: B Chauhan, S Kumar
23 September, 2005·Charge No. 6 related to order dated 1.8.1996, while working as Judicial Magistrate, petitioner granted bail to accused Arif and Rais in Crime No. 218 of 1996 State v. Arif and Ors. under Sections 323, 354 and 452 IPC, illegally against all judicial norms and propriety knowing that on 31.7.1996 he ha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Autar Son Of Late Sri Santoshi vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ...
Judges: T Agarwala
23 September, 2005·3. A counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents stating that the petitioner's father worked as a daily rated employee and that his services was not regularised and therefore the petitioner's father was not a Government servant as contemplated under the Dying-in-Harness Rules, 1974. Conseque...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shanker Yadav Son Of Ram Nath (In ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: I Murtaza, A Saran
23 September, 2005·8. P.W.I Smt. Suraj Mati deposed that Rita Devi was the wife of his brother Moti Lal. He was working in Diwan Rubber Factory and her husband was also working in the same factory. Moti Lal was living in the house of Ramji Lal for about one and a half years. She lives in Diwan Colony. About quarter to...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. Badminton Association vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: P Kant, K Rakhra
22 September, 2005·27. The Apex Court in the case of Whirlpool Corporation v. Registrar of Trade Marks Mumbai and Ors. , has laid down the following guidelines for determining the question of alternative remedy: Under Article 226 of the Constitution, the High Court, having regard to the facts of the case, has a discre...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Shakir Ali And Ors. vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Judges: Y Singh, R Rastogi
22 September, 2005·Ordinarily, the 1/3rd of the gross income has to be deducted towards personal expenses of the deceased and 2/3rd is to be taken as the contribution for the family. Calculated on that basis, the deceased would have contributed Rs. 500 per month. It would be unpragmatic to hold that there would have b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.