Sukkhi S/O Bhule Singh (In Jail) vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
09 September, 2005·2. This application is filed by the applicant with a prayer that the applicant may be released on bail in case Crime No. 34 of 2005, under Sections 363, 366 and 120B, I.P.C. P.S. Khanpur, District Bulandshahar.' 3. From the perusal of the record it appears that in the present case the F.I.R. was lod...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Krishna Raj Singh Alias Babloo ... vs The State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
09 September, 2005·2. From the perusal of the record it appears that in the present case the F.I.R. was lodged by one Smt Geeta Singh at P.S. Karchhana, District Allahabad in case crime No. 462 2004,under Section 364, 406 I.P.C. on 28.12.2004 at 6.10 p.m. against the applicant in respect of the incident which had occu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Champat Son Of Shri Ramanpal Pali ... vs The State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
09 September, 2005·2. This application is filed by the applicant Champat with a prayer that he may be released on bail in case Crime No. 85 of 2005, under Sections 342, 366 and 376 I.P.C. P.S. Musajhag, District Budaun. " 3. From the perusal of the record it appears that in the present case the F.I.R. was lodged by on...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ex. Constable 539 Cp Kanhaiya Lal ... vs State Of U.P. Through Deputy ...
Judges: T Agarwala
09 September, 2005·"...Thus, whether it was practicable to hold the inquiry or not must be judged in the context of whether it was reasonably practicable to do so. It is not a total or absolute impracticability, which is required by clause (b). What is requisite is that the holding of the inquiry is not practicable in...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kaptan Singh Raghav Son Of Late ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
09 September, 2005·2. This application is filed by the applicant Kaptan Singh Raghav with a prayer that the applicant may be released on bail in case Crime No. 138 of 2005, under Sections 498A, 323, 324, 307, 506 I.P.C. and Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act P.S. Quarsi, District Aligarh. 3. From the perusal of the re...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dinesh Chand Jain vs Dy Cit
Judges:
09 September, 2005·(iii) award costs of this petition to the petitioner." Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present writ petition are that the petitioner is engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of pan masala including wah gutkha in the name of Ashok Enterprises. The petitioner's business and resid...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Suomoto Action Taken By The Court vs Icici Bank Ltd. Through Its ...
Judges: V Sahai, S Yadav
09 September, 2005·% 25&08&05 le; yxHkx 9%45 fjiksVZ dk fnukad o le; % 25&08&05 le; 12%35 ?kVuk LFky] fn'kk vkSj iqfyl LVs'ku % ICICI cSad o Qklyk 2 K.M ls nwjh % iwoksZRrj oknh dk uke o irk % Jh jatu JhokLro ,MoksdsV gkbZdksVZ S/O ch-ds- yky R/O 42 vYykiqj tktZ Vkmu bykgkckn vfHk;qDrx.k dk uke irk % 1- chjsUnz 'kadj ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nadeem Son Of Abdul Wahab (In Jail) vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
09 September, 2005·2. This application is filed by the applicant with a prayer that the applicant may be released on bail in case Crime No. 53 of 2005, under Sections 363, 366, 376, 504 and 506, I.P.C. P.S. Bhojpur, District Ghaziabad. 3. From the perusal of the record it appears that in the present case the F.I.R. wa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashutosh Dwivedi Son Of Late ... vs State Of U.P. Through The ...
Judges: V Saran
09 September, 2005·3. A Full Bench of this Court in the case of Lal Mohammad v. Indian Railway Construction Company Limited 2004 Allahabad Civil Journal 1675 : (2004) 3 ESC 1362 has categorically held that court cannot direct regularization of those working on contract basis de hors the service/recruitment rules. Whil...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. Subash Chand Son Of Sumer ... vs State Of U.P. Through Special ...
Judges: V Sahai, S Yadav
08 September, 2005·"5. The Note below Rule 49-A of the C.C.A. Rules was deleted under Notification No. 16 111-1973-Apptt.(3) dated March 23,11974, and the Note below Rule I-A of the Punishment and Appeal Rules under Notification No. 18 111-1973 (3) Apptt. (3) dated March, 1974, and in both the cases the deletion was t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.