The Commissioner, Trade Tax vs S/S Agarwal Oil Refinery ...
Judges: R Kumar
13 September, 2005·4. Learned Standing Counsel submitted that the dealer opposite party (hereinafter referred to as "the dealer" ) has purchased used oil from unregistered dealer and also from the Railways and such used oil was considered as burnt oil. The assessing authority levied the tax under Section 3AAAA of the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Charan Singh Manager, Janta ... vs State Of U.P. Through The ...
Judges: V Saran
13 September, 2005·2. Admittedly, as per the bye-laws/scheme of administration of the society, the term of the Committee of Management was 3 years. The same was thus to expire on 22.6.2003. However, under the scheme of administration, in case if no fresh Committee of Management was elected, the term of the existing Co...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Central Excise vs Salora International
Judges: R Agrawal, P Krishna
13 September, 2005·"Provided that the Appellate Tribunal may, if it is satisfied that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from presenting the application within the period herein before specified, allow it to present within a further period not exceeding 30 days." 11. Further reference was made to Section ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raju S/O Sri Chiman Chamar And ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
13 September, 2005·2. This application is filed by the applicants Raju and Vinod with a prayer that they may be released on bail in case crime No. 154 of 2004( Sessions Trial No. 11 of 2005), under Sections 364A/34 I.P.C., P.S. Nadigaon district Jalaun. 3. From the perusal of the record it reveals that the in the pres...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Godrej Industries Limited ... vs State Of U.P. Through Collector ...
Judges: B Chauhan, S Kumar
13 September, 2005·3. Shri Rishi Chaddha, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner had no notice or knowledge of the land acquisition proceedings under the Act. Publication was issued as explained above, inviting objections, anJ thus, petitioner submitted the objections. Respondent No. 3 co...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vijay Sahagal Son Of Sri R.K. ... vs State Of U.P. And Gulab Singh ...
Judges: P Srivastava
12 September, 2005·1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State, 2. This application has been filed for quashing the entire proceedings of Session Trial No 274-B of 2001, pending in the court of Additional Session Judge/ Fast Track Court No. 28, Etawah, State v. Vijai Sahagal, under Secti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dina Nath Rai Son Of Rangi Rai And ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...
Judges: A N Ray, A Bhushan
12 September, 2005·1. We are in respectful agreement with the reasoning given and the order passed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sunil Ambwani in his Lordship's impugned order dated 27.7.2005. We would add another reason of ours in maintaining his Lordship's order. 2. The appellant was selected as a Principal of Bramharshi S...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Motor Accidents Claims ...
Judges: R Tiwari
12 September, 2005·6. No documentary evidence was filed by the insurance company. The claimant in support of her case filed certified copies of the F.I.R., map of the site of accident, post-mortem examination report, technical inspection report of the vehicle, certified copy of the charge-sheet, original pay slips of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Sureshwati, Widow Of Late Sri ... vs State Of U.P. Through Collector, ...
Judges: M Prasad
12 September, 2005·2. Relief? 3. Whether the sale deed dated 2-12-88 allegedly executed by Smt. Sureshwawti in favour of M/S NSR Farms Pvt. Ltd. is void as alleged in para 3 of the objections of State paper No. 27-C? If so, its effect?. 8. Issues No. 1 and 3 were disposed of together and the learned District Judge cam...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohan Singh Bais Son Of Sri ... vs State Of U.P., The Joint ...
Judges: B Chauhan, S Kumar
12 September, 2005·9. In State of Haryana v. Piara Singh, , the Hon'ble Supreme Court held as under:- "Thirdly, even where an ad hoc or temporary employment is necessitated on account of the exigencies of administration, he should ordinarily be drawn from the employment exchange unless it cannot brook delay in which c...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.