Amrit Banaspati Company Limited ... vs The Commissioner Of Trade Tax
Judges: P Krishna
21 October, 2005·3. The Assessing Authority in compliance of the aforesaid direction summoned M/s. Ram Rikh Das Roop Chandra, Lucknow, along with account books. Shri Naresh Kumar one of the partners of the firm appeared before the Assessing Authority on 16.1.1986. He was cross- examined by the dealer applicant. Ther...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Prem Raman Goswami vs 3Rd A.D.J. And Anr.
Judges: S Khan
21 October, 2005·1. This is tenant's writ petition. Landlord-respondent No. 2 Vishpati Pachauri filed S.C.C. Suit No. 49 of 1982 against tenant-petitioner Prem Raman Goswami since deceased and survived by legal representatives for eviction and recovery of arrears of rent. In the plaint it was alleged that rate of re...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vijay Singh Son Of Munshi Singh vs U.P. State Road Transport ...
Judges: R Tiwari
20 October, 2005·^^mRrjkapy 'kklu vkS|ksfxd fodkl vuqHkkx&&1 la[;k%& [email protected]&vkS-fo- @05 @182& 04 nsgjknwu fnukad%& 12 tqykbZ 2005 &&%%vf/klwpuk%%&& lkoZtfud [email protected] miØeksa esa dk;Zjr dkfeZdks dh vf/ko"kZrk vk;q yksdfgr esa 58 o"kZ ds LFkku ij 60 o"kZ djus dh jkT;iky egksn; lg"kZ LohÑfr iznku dj...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Tej Kumari Chopra W/O Shri ... vs State Of U.P. Through The ...
Judges: A Sahi
20 October, 2005·4. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of of the U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad in the leading case i.e. writ petition No. 56557 of 2005 and a supplementary affidavit has also been brought on record and it is contended on behalf of the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to raise...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jai Pal Gupta vs Kali Charan And Ors.
Judges: V Misra
20 October, 2005·285. Order to receive payment.--The order to receive payment be prepared in the office of the court and shall be enfaced upon the duplicate and triplicate forms of the tender, and shall run in the name of the treasury or Receiving Officer as prescribed in Rules 277 and 278. The order shall be signed...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Commissioner, Trade Tax vs S/S Deva Metal Powder Pvt. Ltd.
Judges: R Kumar
20 October, 2005·2. Dealer/opposite party (hereinafter referred to as "Dealer") was engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of aluminium powder. In the original assessment orders passed under Section 7(3) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act and under Section 9 of Central Sales Tax Act aluminium powder have been treate...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashok Kumar Yadav Son Of Ram Kumar ... vs State Of U.P. Through The ...
Judges: A Tandon
20 October, 2005·4. For appreciating the controversy raised in the present writ petition, Rule 3, which provides for the major penalties which could be imposed upon the government servant, be notified. Rule 3 is being quoted herein below: 3. Penalties.-- The following penalties may, for good and sufficient reason an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shri Th. Brashbhanji Maharaj ... vs Smt. Kampuri Widow Of Nandi, Smt. ...
Judges: S Ambwani
20 October, 2005·2. The plaintiff- appellant filed a suit for declaration that defendant Smt. Kampuri, widow of Shri Nandi did not have any right to inherit 'shebaitship' of Shri Thakur Brashbhanji Maharaj, an idol in a temple in village Barsana, including about 22 khotharis on the boundaries of its compound. The pl...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandra Shekhar Son Of Shri ... vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh, Rajeev ...
Judges: P Srivastava
20 October, 2005·1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State, 2. This application has been filed for quashing the entire proceedings and charge sheet in case No. 953 of 2005, State v. Chandra Shekhar and Ors., arising out of case crime No. 128 of 2005, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Union Of India (Uoi) Through ... vs Sarita Alias Shanti Devi
Judges: U Dhaon, R Yadav
20 October, 2005·4. The Claims Tribunal, on an appraisal of the evidence adduced by the parties, held that the respondent was travelling with a valid ticket and she was thrown off the train on account of overcrowding and sustained injuries by another passing train from same railway line and that she was entitled to ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.