Surendra Kumar Dwivedi, Mahendra ... vs The Vth Additional District ...
Judges: S Khan
24 October, 2005·2. Trial court/JSCC/Munsiff VIIth Jhansi found that tenant was defaulter since 12.11.1975, that the rate of rent was Rs. 15/ per month and that tenant had also denied the title of the landlord. Trial court also found that defendant was tenant of the disputed room and plaintiff landlord thereof. Tria...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sri Shiv Shankar Awasthi Son Of Sri ... vs Additional District Judge ...
Judges: S Khan
24 October, 2005·2. Trial Court on the one hand held that constructions had been made by the landlord. Thereafter trial court held that landlord had orally permitted the tenant to raise the constructions. Thereafter trial court held that the constructions had neither diminished the value nor utility of the accommoda...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vijay Kumar Son Of Baldev Mitra vs District Supply ...
Judges: S Khan
24 October, 2005·2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that when the house in dispute was given on rent to his father Baldev Mitra, petitioner was also major and hence he also became tenant. Firstly, this proposition cannot be accepted. If the tenant at the time of taking the house on rent had got some ma...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dhaja Ram Son Of Sri Ram Persad vs Vith Additional District Judge ...
Judges: S Khan
24 October, 2005·3. In the earlier suit (SCC suit No. 77 of 1980) petitioner had filed written statement. In the said written statement it had been pleaded that apart from Kashi Ram the plaintiff his brother Sagar Mai was also owner landlord of the property in dispute and suit was bad for non-joinder of necessary pa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hari Ram Jangre Son Of Shri Babu Lal vs Nazir Khan Son Of Nawab Khan And Iv ...
Judges: S Khan
24 October, 2005·3. As far as alleged notice dated 17.5.1963 is concerned, the trial Court had held that the envelope in which the said notice was alleged to have been served upon the tenant was not filed. Before the revisional Court some envelope was filed and the revisional Court took that to be the envelope, whic...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ahmad Son Of Natthoo, Subedar Son ... vs Iii Addl. District Judge, Judge ...
Judges: S Khan
21 October, 2005·2. The revisional Court wrongly held that on 28.4.1986 suit was dismissed in default. On 28.4.1986 suit was dismissed on merit. Both the Courts below mainly placing reliance upon Mohd. Ali v. Indar Lal 1983 (2) A.R.C. 353 held that as order dated 24.4.1986 (which had been passed before the suit was ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Kubra Begum Wife Of Hazi ... vs Iiird Additional District Judge ...
Judges: S Khan
21 October, 2005·1. This writ petition arises out of SCC suit No. 272 of 1983 filed by petitioner against Bhoorey original respondent No. 3 since deceased and survived by legal representatives. Smt. Kubra Begum plaintiff and Bhoorey the defendant were first cousins in the sense that their fathers were real brothers....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahesh Kumar S/O Shri Anand ... vs State Of U.P. Through Its ...
Judges: T Agarwala
21 October, 2005·The petitioners are admittedly much below the 20 candidates in the merit list dated 5.4.2000 and as such they could not have been included in the list prepared by the District Judge. Their very inclusion is invalid. The same is the position with regard to such other candidates who stand on a similar...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax, ... vs Shri Bankey Lal And Ors.
Judges: R Agrawal, P Krishna
21 October, 2005·6. All the 5 assessees as well as the department preferred separate appeals before the Tribunal. The Department contended that the income capitalization method adopted by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was not the correct method to arrive at the net wealth of the Firm in which the assessees we...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rakesh Khare Son Of Sri Durga ... vs Punjab National Bank 7 Through Its ...
Judges: R Agrawal
21 October, 2005·3. In the counter affidavit affirmed by Satish Kumar Sharma and filed on behalf of the respondents, it has been stated that the petitioner's placement as Clerk-cum-Cashier has been in accordance with the scheme of amalgamation which scheme has also been upheld by the Apex Court and his name has corr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.