S. Majumdar (D.) Through L.Rs. vs A.D.J. And Anr.
Judges: S Khan
25 October, 2005·3. The appellate court rightly held that 22 persons including seven married couples could not be compelled to reside in ten-room accommodation just to protect the tenant from eviction. The approach of the prescribed authority in this regard was rather illegal. Prescribed Authority did not properly a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Darshan Singh And Har Govind Singh ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: P Srivastava
24 October, 2005·2. This application has been filed for quashing the entire proceedings of Session Trial No. 244 of 1995, State v. Darshan Singh and Anr., pending in the Court of Additional Session Judge (Fast Track Court No. 1), Etawah, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 201, 120B I.P.C. arising out of case crime N...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sudhir Kumar Agrawal Son Of Shri ... vs Lal Naubat Ram Agrawal Son Of Lala ...
Judges: S Khan
24 October, 2005·1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Shrimati Seema Agarwal, Learned counsel who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of landlord respondent. 2. All the facts necessary to decide the point involved are conained in the writ petition and its annexdures, hence there is no need for counter ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rais Ahmad, Son Of Sri Riaz Uddin vs The Commissioner, Allahabad ...
Judges: R Tiwari
24 October, 2005·4. The Collector, Allahabad had fixed the market value at circle rate of the said property for the purposes of stamp duty and valuation of the property itself according to the rates given in Annexure 1 to the writ petition. According to the aforesaid notification appended as Annexure 1 to the writ p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Commissioner, Trade Tax vs Orai Oil Came Pvt. Ltd.
Judges: R Kumar
24 October, 2005·2. Dealer/opposite party (hereinafter referred to as "Dealer") was a manufacturer engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of refined edible oil. Dealer unit was a new unit and accordingly, dealer was holding eligible certificate under Section 4-A of the Act. Dealer had also been issued recog...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Noida Toll Bridge Co. Ltd. vs Secured Creditors Of Noida Toll ...
Judges: S Ambwani
24 October, 2005·5. In order to reduce the interest burden, the petitioner approached the CDR Empowered Group set up under the Corporate Debt Restructuring (CDR) Scheme with a proposal for restructuring repayment of a principal sum of Rs. 235.77 crores and interest due thereon to the Banks and Financial Institutions...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. Jai Kishan Prasad Khandelwal ... vs Viith Additional District Judge, ...
Judges: S Khan
24 October, 2005·3. Firstly, the lower appellate court held that both the opposite parties in the release application i.e. Dau Dayal and Chandra Bhan were tenants and in the release application nothing was said regarding bonafide need/hardship of Chandra Bhan hence release application was liable to be dismissed. Nee...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Premlata Wife Of Late Hari ... vs State Of U.P. Through The ...
Judges: A Sahi
24 October, 2005·1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned standing Counsel for the respondent No. 2, respondent Nos. 4 to 6 and Sri P.D. Tripathi for the respondent Nos. 1 and 3. 2. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 29.9.2005 Annexure 1 to the writ petition, whereby the petitioner's appoin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Bahadur Son Of Shankar Lal, ... vs 3Rd Additional District Judge And ...
Judges: S Khan
24 October, 2005·2. The trial court held that the notice of demand was not in accordance with the Act as no proper demand of rent was made in the said notice. Revisional court differed with the said view and held that a clear demand was made In the notice. Annexure-1 to the writ petition is the copy of the notice. I...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Umesh Chandra Son Of Late Sri ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...
Judges: B Chauhan, B Sapru
24 October, 2005·9. Both the charges stood proved against the petitioner, as referred to above. 10. Shri Rajvanshi has submitted that once the order passed by him under Section 239, Cr.P.C. had been rectified in a revision and bail order could: be said to suffer from judicial error, the enquiry was not required. The...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.