Nathuram S/O Ajgar Singh, Genda ... vs The State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
21 November, 2005·3. This revision is filed against the judgment and order dated 22.4.1985, passed by Sri O.P. Jain, IV Additional Sessions Judge, Mainpuri, by which the criminal Appeal No. 145 of 1983 was dismissed by confirming the judgment and order dated 30.6.1983, passed by Sri J.K. Sant, III Addl. Munsif Magist...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ravindra Pal Singh Son Of Sri ... vs Housing ...
Judges: R Tiwari
21 November, 2005·Dinank: 24.10.2005 Sd/-Illegible (jagdish Prasad) Sudasya Prashasak Committee, Uprokta Samiti Evam Sahkari Awas Adhikari, Agra 3. Note: (The original letter is in Devnagri script which is given hereinabove in Roman script due to technical reason). 4. Sri H.R. Misra has put in appearance on behalf of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Suresh Chandra Son Of Lalloo Ram, ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ...
Judges: R Tiwari
21 November, 2005·2. By means of this writ petition the petitioners have sought a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 11.8.2005 passed by the respondent-Bank. 3. The petitioners are Home Guards. They were deputed to work as Guards in various branches of the respondent-Bank on 31.121999 by the Distric...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Yogendra Singh Son Of Late Sri Brij ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
18 November, 2005·2. The applicant has applied for bail in Case Crime No. 19 of 2005 under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 109 I.P.C. and Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act P.S. Kotwali Dehat District Gonda. 3. From the perusal of the record, it reveals that in the present case, the F.I.R. was ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shahbuddin S/O Sarfuddin vs State Of U.P. And Smt. Shakeela ...
Judges: M Mittal
18 November, 2005·2. Application has been filed under Section 462 Cr.P.C. with the prayer to quash the order dated 30.9.2005 passed by Family Court, Meerut, whereby he allowed the application for interim maintenance filed by the opposite party No. 2 in Misc. Case No. 147 of 2003 Smt. Shakeela v. Shahabuddin with effe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raj Kumar S/O Bhuwanesh vs State Of U.P.
Judges: I Murtaza, G Srivastava
18 November, 2005·6. The case of the defence was of denial. 7. P.W 1 Sheel Chandra, informant deposed that the occurrence had taken place about 1 year and four months back. His daughter Km. Rinki brought tea at his Pan shop, situated at Dhabarsi Bus Stand. He had also given her money but she did not reach home. He ha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Indra Deo Narain Singh Son Of Sri ... vs The State Of U.P. Through ...
Judges: S Yadav
18 November, 2005·3. That before giving parawise reply of the writ petition it is stated that the petitioners were working as Seasonal Collection Amins from time to time in tehsil and district Deoria, While the petitioners were working as Seasonal Collection Amins certain posts fell vacant of Collection Amins. Since ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Suresh Chandra Son Of Ram Chandra ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: R Tiwari
18 November, 2005·8. The Counsel for the respondents rebutting the arguments advanced on behalf of the petitioners submits that the petitioners are permanent employees of the Corporation and were working only on deputation in SUDA. He states that the petitioners could have been absorbed by the borrowing department wi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Darash Son Of Sharda Prasad vs State Of U.P. Through Its ...
Judges: R Tiwari
18 November, 2005·The record : 6. The petitioner was placed under suspension vide order dated 9.7.2003 and was served with a charge sheet dated 19.7.2003 for the following charges :- vkjksi i= vkjksi i= ,r}kjk vki ij fuEufyf[kr vkjksi yxk;s tkrs gS %& ;g fd fupykSy fMiks dh okgu la[;k ;w0ih0 [email protected],y&9585 ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Naresh Chandra Sharma Son Of Late ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ...
Judges: A Tandon
18 November, 2005·Ukt Dono Screening Commiteeyon Ka Koi Vidhik Status Nahin Hoga. Na Ve Kewal Sambandhit Niyukti Pradhikaron Ke Samadhan Mein Sahayta Ke Liye Hongi, Va Unki Karyavahiyan Bhi Unaupcharik Hongi. Va Unke Gathan Mein Kisi Rikti Athwa Anva Kisi Anaupcharikta Ke Hote Hue Bhi Nivukti pradhikari Swa Vivek Se ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.