Anoop Singh Son Of Shri Ram ... vs District Collector/District ...
Judges: S Agarwal
22 November, 2005·v) A number of candidates residing outside the State of U.P. and belonging to the State of Bihar have been selected. 4. The aforesaid representation has been considered by the District Magistrate, Fatehpur and vide his order dt. 20.1.1997 he has rejected the said representation recording the followi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Savitri Devi Wife Of Shri ... vs State Of U.P., Gayatri Son Of Shri ...
Judges: R Deepak
22 November, 2005·2. The present criminal misc. writ petition has come up against the orders dated 7.4.2004 and 17.8.2004 passed by the courts below on the protest petition filed against the submission of final report, disallowing the prayer for directing the case to proceed as State case / police challani. 3. The fa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Alok Awasthi Son Of Late Ved ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: A Tandon
22 November, 2005·6. It is not in dispute that the petitioners applied in pursuance of the said advertisement and also participated in the process of selection by way of direct recruitment. The result of the selection so held was published on 6th August, 2004 and as many as 36 candidates were shown to be selected in ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shri Kishore And Anr. vs Roop Kishore
Judges: V Saran
22 November, 2005·27 Production of additional evidence in Appellate Court- (1) The parties to an appeal shall not be entitled to produce additional evidence, whether oral or documentary, in the Appellate Court. But if- (a) the Court from whose decree the appeal is preferred has refused to admit evidence which ought t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kripa Shankar Dwivedi Son Of Shri ... vs U.P. State Electricity Board ...
Judges: S R Alam, V Nath
22 November, 2005·4. The appellants pursuant to the judgment dated 10.2.1982 did not pursue the matter with the Tribunal for back wages. They however approached the Board but could not find favour with the Board as no orders for absorption were passed, whereupon they filed Writ Petition No. 6887 of 1986 before this C...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ikramul Haq Son Of Sri Mumtajul Haq vs Mohammad Sabir Son Of Mohammad ...
Judges: S R Alam, V Nath
22 November, 2005·4. Both the petitions were consolidated and heard together by the learned single Judge. 5. The contentions of Iqramul Haque (appellant in both the appeals) was mainly based upon the fact that he had acquired master's degree before the date of occurrence of vacancy i.e. 30.6.96 and therefore, possess...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Insan Ali Son Of Ibarat Ali vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation ...
Judges: S Srivastava
22 November, 2005·4. Considered the arguments of learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 5. For recalling an order dismissing a case in default and restoring the same, provisions of Section 41 of the U.P.C.H. Act are applicable, which are being reproduced below: - 41. Application of U.P. Land Reven...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Brij Lal Yadav Son Of Sri ... vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. ...
Judges: R Agrawal, S Bala
22 November, 2005·8. Column 20 of the application form for dealership of retail outlet required disclosure by the petitioner if he has ever been convicted for any criminal offence involving moral turpitude and/or economic offence (other than freedom struggle) or there are any charges framed by the court against him. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Union Of India (Uoi) Through Its ... vs Central Administrative ...
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
22 November, 2005·4. The purpose of granting any interlocutory injunction is to preserve or restore the status quo of the last non-contested status which preceded the pending controversy, until the final hearing, when full relief may be granted. But, since the granting of such an injunction to a party, who avails or ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rahul Maheshwari vs Rashmi Maheshwari
Judges: V Misra
21 November, 2005·1. On the joint request of learned Counsel for the parties, this appeal is being disposed of finally at the admission stage. 2. Heard Shri Murlidhar senior advocate assisted by Shri R. K. Ojha learned Counsel for the appellant-applicant and Shri C. L. Pandey learned Counsel for the respondent at len...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.