U.P. State Road Transport ... vs Manjoor Ahmad Son Of Syed Mahmood ...
Judges: S Kumar
29 November, 2005·8. On the other hand, the counsel for the respondents has submitted that the contention of the petitioner to this effect that the present proceeding is barred by res judicata is not correct and adjudication case No. 256 of 1991 was for the purposes of regularization as during pendency of the proceed...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Committee Of Management Of Bijnor ... vs Director Of Education ...
Judges: V Saran
29 November, 2005·2. By means of this writ petition the petitioners have prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to permit the petitioners to continue and manage the affairs of the Bijnor Inter College, Bijnor till the office bearers of the newly elected Committee of Management joi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rakesh Kumar Srivastava Son Of Sri ... vs Manager Dugh Utpadak Sahkari ...
Judges: R Tiwari
29 November, 2005·2. Sri Padia, counsel for the petitioner states that he was granted time to file rejoinder affidavit and he communicate the same to his client but has received no response as such, no rejoinder affidavit could be filed. In view of this statement of Sri Padia, the case is being decided on merits, at ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahesh Prasad Gupta Son Of Rama ... vs Northern Railway Primary ...
Judges: R Tiwari
29 November, 2005·5. The learned,counsel tor the petitioner has placed reliance upon Regulation 27 (III ) wherein it has been provided that promotion to the posts under a Co-operative Society, whether from one grade to another within the same category of posts or from one category of posts to another category, shall ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagdish And Ors. vs Shaukeen And Ors.
Judges: J Sahai
29 November, 2005·1. Proceedings under Section 198 (4) of the U. P. Zamlndari Abolition and Land Reforms Act were initiated against the petitioners. The application of the complainant was rejected by the order dated 24.4.03, passed by the Additional Collector (Finance and Revenue), Ghaziabad. Against that order the c...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Niwas Pandey (Constable No. ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through ...
Judges: S R Alam, S Agarwal
29 November, 2005·90. General: Transfer of members of the Force may be ordered from one place to any other place in India in the exigencies of service or for administrative reasons or to avoid local entanglements of such members or for any other consideration. 8. A perusal of the aforesaid provision shows that a memb...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: Secure Industries Ltd. vs Unknown
Judges: S Ambwani
29 November, 2005·2. In this creditors winding up petition notice were issued on February 25, 1999. The respondent-company has filed a counter affidavit. Sri S.P. Agarwal made preliminary objection namely that the notice of demand under Section 434(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, was not served upon the respondent-com...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagmohan Bhola Son Of Sri ... vs The Vice Chairman Ghaziabad ...
Judges: R Agrawal, S Bala
28 November, 2005·vi) The size of the plots announced by the G.D.A. being only-approximate, the bidders whose bids are accepted shall have to accept variation upto 15% either way in the area of the plot and consequently in the total permissible covered area for which the bid has been offered and accepted, subject of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Km. Archana Minor Through Her Next ... vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ...
Judges: V Saran
28 November, 2005·1. The petitioner appeared in the Intermediate Examination held in 2005 by the Board of High School & Intermediate Education, Allahabad. The result of the petitioner had been withheld. On 24.6.2005 the petitioner was issued a charge sheet by the Assistant Secretary of the Board and she was required ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shramik Samaj Kalyan Sangh, ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
28 November, 2005·5. The question does arise as to whether such a Government Order could have been issued by the Chief Secretary of the State of U.P. as the bus stand is fixed by the Transport Authorities under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short the 'Act'). 6. The issue involved herein is no more res integra as ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.