Onkar Nath Dubey S/O Shital Prasad ... vs State Of U.P., Baleshwar Prasad, ...
Judges: K Ojha
08 November, 2005·5. In enquiry ADM (Civil Supply) found that forgery was committed and in revision also Addl. District Judge Court No. 14 Varanasi held on 14.3.05 that Photostat copy of original order was obtained and the name of opposite party No. 2 was got deleted. On photostat copy applicant got his name written ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Waqf Khuda Wand Tala Masuma ... vs Arun Kumar And Anr.
Judges: S Khan
08 November, 2005·1. The land over which shop in dispute is constructed is the wakf property which was given on lease to Arun Kumar, respondent No. 1 through a deed executed on 20.10.1983. Thereafter another deed was also executed on 20.7.1984. Through the said deed Arun Kumar, respondent No. 1 was permitted to const...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jai Prakash Lal S/O Late Brahm Deo ... vs Government Of India Through ...
Judges: R Tiwari
08 November, 2005·As matter is pending before the competent authority, I issue an ad interim mandamus to the competent authority to decide the matter of appointment of petitioner on compassionate ground in accordance with Rules within a period of three weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mrs. Slama Aijaz Wife Of Aijaz ... vs The State Of U.P., The Chief ...
Judges: S Shanker
08 November, 2005·5. I have heard learned counsel for the both the sides and perused the records. 6. It is contended on behalf of the revisionist that the learned court below has wrongly rejected the release application on the ground of lack of jurisdiction and that the court below has jurisdiction to decide the rele...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kamla Devi Balika Uchchattar ... vs Chhetriya Sachiv Madhyamik ...
Judges: V Saran
08 November, 2005·1. By means of this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for quashing of an order dated 13.2.2003 passed by Respondent No. 1 whereby the application of the petitioner for grant of recognition has been rejected. A further prayer has been made for a direction to the respondents to consider the appl...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rameshwar Singh And Anr. vs Ramesh Chandra And Ors.
Judges: S Khan
08 November, 2005·2. Against the order dated 30.4.1979, two revisions were filed. Civil Revision No. 107 of 1979 was filed by petitioner No. 2 and Civil Revision No. 113 of 1979 by petitioner No. 1. District Judge, Etawah, through judgment and order dated 2.3.1983, held that the revisions, against order refusing decl...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dcm Shriram Industries Ltd., ... vs Presiding Officer, Labour ...
Judges: S Kumar
08 November, 2005·"(c) Theft, fraud, or dishonesty in connection with the factory's business or property or the property belonging to workmen." 3. The reply was invited and an inquiry was conducted by one Sri K. Tiwari as Inquiry Officer and workman was given foil opportunity to defend himself and to cross examine th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Babloo Alias Dori Lal S/O Sri ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: I Murtaza, A Saran
08 November, 2005·14. The submission that the child had gone off somewhere to play and fell down into Jayanti nala on his own does not hold water. The deceased child Kaku, was only about 4 years in age. He was not likely to have ventured unescorted to the place where his dead body was found, which was at some distanc...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Khagendra Pal Singh, Alias Khed ... vs Commissioner, Agra Division And ...
Judges: V Saran
08 November, 2005·1. The petitioner was granted an arms license in the year 1991. A first information report was lodged against the petitioner on 16.7.1999. Thereafter the petitioner was issued a show cause notice and his arms license was placed under suspension. Challenging the said order the petitioner filed writ p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shri Virendra Pratap Gupta Son Of ... vs The Regional Manager, U.P. State ...
Judges: S Yadav
08 November, 2005·2. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the aforesaid interim order passed by this Court the petitioner is continuously working since then on the post of Marketing Inspector till now and regular payment of salary is also being made to him. The learned Counsel for the petitio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.