Vijay Kumar And Krishna Kumar Sons ... vs Iind Additional District Judge ...
Judges: S Khan
14 November, 2005·2. It is difficult to reconcile the two findings recorded in the earlier judgment of this Court. On the one hand it was held that petitioners having purchased a share of one of the co-owners of the property became co-owner hence there was no question of regularization of tenancy on the other hand th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Om Prakash Son Of Shri Ram Nath vs 10Th Additional District And ...
Judges: S Khan
14 November, 2005·4. There is no need to decide the question of eviction on the ground of subletting as both the plaintiff/ chief tenant as well as defendant No. 3/ one of the owners landlord admitted in their statement given in the year 1978 that petitioner was inducted as tenant/sub tenant 40 years before i.e. in o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nanak Chand Narwani Son Of Sri Bikh ... vs State Of U.P. Through Special ...
Judges: B Sapru
14 November, 2005·3. The admitted fact of the case are that an advertisement was issued by the concerned Department on 1.3.97 by which Khasra No. 302 having an area of 8 acres was advertised for mining. In pursuance of the said notification, the petitioner moved an application for grant of lease of Khasra No. 302, ar...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Davendra Singh vs Sukhrani And Ors.
Judges: V Misra
14 November, 2005·2. F.A.F.0.2370 of 2003 has been filed by the appellant against the judgment and award dated 30.5.2003 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/ Additional District Judge, Kanpur Nagar, in Motor Accident Claims Petition No. 581 of 2000, Sukhrani v. Devendra Singh on 30.5.2003. This appeal was ad...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sarvesh Kumar S/O Dev Narain vs State Of U.P. Through Special ...
Judges: R Kumar
14 November, 2005·4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent No. 1 has illegally allowed the respondent Nos. 5-and 6 to run the shop at Tirva crossing while in the year 2004-05 they were the licencee of the shop at Bajrang Hotel and their licence for the year 2005-06 should be renewed only fo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Commissioner, Trade Tax vs Jagdamba Agencies
Judges: R Kumar
14 November, 2005·3. Tribunal held that as per the various decisions of the High Court and the Supreme Court, on the initiation of the proceedings under Section 21 of the Act, the action could not be taken under Section 10-B of the Act. It has been held that when the proceeding under Section 21 of the Act had been in...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Kumar Dubey Son Of Sri Phool ... vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court ...
Judges: B Sapru
14 November, 2005·3. Petitioner was terminated by the order dated 1.3.1983 which clearly reflects that this was not a plain and simple letter of discharge. The reason for terminating the petitioner workman was on account of fact that he was facing criminal charges for having committed offences under Section 395/397 I...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Uttar Pradesh Rajya Sahakari ... vs Labour Court And Ram Singh Son Of ...
Judges: V Misra
11 November, 2005·3. The facts of the case in brief are that the respondent No. 2 was appointed as a daily wager in the petitioner-establishment on account of exigency of work on 21.10.1983 and thereafter he worked as a daily wager with effect from 1.7.1986, and when he requested for being regularized, his services w...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jawahar Lal S/O Bechan Ram And Udai ... vs Deputy Director Of Education ...
Judges: T Agarwala
11 November, 2005·(2) Fifty per cent of the total number of sanctioned posts of head clerk and clerks shall be filled among the serving clerks and employees through promotion. If employee possesses prescribed eligibility and he has served continuously for 5 years on his substantive post and his service record is good...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. vs Swami Deen S/O Chhedi Lal And Ors.
Judges: M Jain, B Agarwal
11 November, 2005·10. Thus, the post mortem report shows that the deceased had received three gunshot wounds of entry with, corresponding exists and yet another gunshot wound of entry penetrating to right arm (ante mortem injury No. 8). The deceased had died due to shock and haemorrhage as a result Of ante mortem inj...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.