Mangal Dev Son Of Ram Roop And ... vs The State Election Commission ...
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
26 May, 2005·6. The procedure in this regard is prescribed under the Act, 1947 and Rules, 1994. Section 9 of the Act, 1947 deals with the procedure 'for preparing the electoral roll for each territorial constituency. Sub-section (7) thereof provides that every person is entitled to be registered as a voter only ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Suraksha Rani Chopra Wife Of ... vs State Of U.P. Through The ...
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
26 May, 2005·10. A combined reading of the said provisions makes it crystal dear that there should be a prohibition in respect of development to the extent it contravenes the Master Plan published by the Authority, or the Rules/Bye-laws framed thereunder. 11. The issue involved herein is no more res integra as A...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Sri Ram Memorial Education ...
Judges: P Kant, R Yadav
26 May, 2005·6. After considering the defence of the assessee, the Assessing Officer held that the assessee has committed default and imposed a penalty of Rs. 93,500 under Section 272A(2)(c) of the Act. Under the same circumstances, penalty of Rs. 75,100 was also imposed under the aforesaid provision for the fin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Vidyawati vs Iind A.D.J. And Ors.
Judges: V Nath
26 May, 2005·(ii) To consider the effect of gallery on the ground floor being commonly used by members of the family of the landlady and the tenant, for1 parking cycles etc. (iii) The effect of their being no latrine on the ground floor and the occupant of the ground floor would go to the first floor through the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Urmila Devi vs District Judge And Ors.
Judges: V Nath
26 May, 2005·4. Aggrieved by the said judgment the landlady has approached this Court by means of the present writ petition. 5. I have heard Sri Ajay Sharma, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri S. M. Dayal, learned Counsel for the respondent Nos. 3 to 7. 6. The contention of the learned Counsel for the pe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vinod Kumar Dixit vs A.D.J. (Viiith) And Ors.
Judges: V Nath
26 May, 2005·7. Three points have been raised by the petitioner, firstly there was non-compliance of Rules 8 and 9 of the Rules framed under the Act which are mandatory and therefore, the impugned orders are vitiated in law. The next contention is that the service by publication upon the landlord is not permissi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Naresh vs Food Corporation Of India And Ors.
Judges: V Nath
26 May, 2005·5. Supplementary affidavit has been filed by the petitioner on 10.3.2005 along with certified copy of judgment of the Special Judge, E.C. Act, Lucknow dated 24.2.2005 (Annexed as Annexure S.A. 2) whereby petitioner has been acquitted of the charge levelled against him. In the circumstances, learned ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pankaj Son Of Charan Singh And ... vs State Of U.P. And Prem Pal Singh Son ...
Judges: P Srivastava
26 May, 2005·1. Heard earned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This application has been filed challenging the order dated 6.5.2005 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Baghpat declining to entertain an application moved on behalf of the applicants claiming to be a juvenile and is ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
G.C. Gupta Son Of Shri Mahesh ... vs State Of U.P. And Central Bureau ...
Judges: R Deepak
26 May, 2005·2. I have heard Sri Ravi Kiran Jain, learned senior counsel assisted by Sri Swetashwa Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri G.S. Hajela, learned counsel for C.B.I. and perused the record. 3. The learned counsel for the parties have cited the following case laws in support of their content...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chairman-Cum-Managing ... vs Regional Labour Commissioner ...
Judges: R Tiwari
26 May, 2005·"...After hearing contention of both the parties and also after examining the related documents available in the filed of C.A. it is observed that the C.A. has rightly given its direction. Although Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 specifically excludes the apprentices appointed under the Apprentices Ac...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.