Mohd. Mustkeem Siddiqui vs Smt. Jahida Khatoon
Judges: A Kumar
04 May, 2005·2. The brief facts of the present case are that the petitioner, who is a tenant of the premises in question, has been served with a notice by the respondent-landlord terminating his tenancy on the ground that the U. P. Act No. XIII of 1972, here-in-after referred to as 'the Act', do not apply to the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Adarsh Cold Storage
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
03 May, 2005·2. The present reference relates to the asst. yr. 1979-80. 3. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise of the present reference are as follows : The applicant is running a cold storage in Budaun. Originally, the cold storage was built in 1967 or 1968. After this, an additional chamber was completed dur...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Umesh Chandra Pandey Son Of Sri ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through ...
Judges: A Yog, B Agarwal
03 May, 2005·It is also relevant to mention here that the persons who were engaged as other than Moble Booking Clerks, such as during Ardh Kumbh Mela etc. for short period etc. are not M.B.Cs and as per directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court given in the SLP No. CC-24442 dated 7.4.1994 in re. Union of India and...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Amritraj S. Punamiya, Huf vs Ito, Ward 24(15)
Judges:
03 May, 2005·3. Before us the learned counsel of the assessee submitted that the assessment of the assessee was originally completed under section 143(1). Later the assessment was reopened on 22-12-1997 under section 148. The said sum of Rs. 2,57,000 was received by the assessee in foreign exchange. The FERA aut...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Dilip Kumar Kali Charan
Judges: R Agarwal, R Kumar
03 May, 2005·Respondent-assessee (hereinafter referred to as the 'assessee') has constituted a partnership vide partnership deed dt. 19th Oct., 1980 consisting of three partners having shares in profit and loss of 50 per cent, 40 per cent and 10 per cent, respectively, arising out of the business of purchase and...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs U.P. Co-Operative Cane Union ...
Judges: P Kant, R Yadav
03 May, 2005·6. Before us it has been reiterated by the counsel for the appellant (Revenue) that Section 271B allowed the assessing authority to impose a penalty as admittedly the final audit report as required under Section 44AB was not filed within time and that the cause shown by the assessee could not have b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
New India Assurance Company ... vs Smt. Sughra And Ors.
Judges: P Kant, R Yadav
03 May, 2005·7. The Workmen Compensation Commissioner on considering the evidence on record, found that the age of the deceased was 40 years at the time of death and that the compensation has to be awarded by taking into consideration the salary of Rs. one thousand per month and the amount of Khuraki (Rs. 35 per...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vora Electric Service Through Its ... vs State Of U.P. Through The ...
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
03 May, 2005·4. Heard Sri Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri M.R. Jaiswal, learned Standing Counsel. 5. The contention of the petitioner is that alongwith application under Section 7-D of the Act, petitioner has filed a copy of the agreement and after examining the nature of the contract men...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kallu And 6 Ors. And O.P.S. Malik vs The Rent Control And Eviction ...
Judges: S Khan
03 May, 2005·1. The above noted clarification application was filed by occupants of servant quarters and was dismissed by me on 23.2.2005. Through the instant review petition, it has been argued that through the allotment order dated 17.3.1993 only that portion was allotted to Sri O.P.S. Malik which was in the o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs Prem Shanker
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
03 May, 2005·Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally correct in sustaining the order ofthe Commissioner (Appeals), cancelling the penaltv of Rs. 1,00,000 imposed under Section 271B of the Incoinc-tax Act, 1961, by holding that no penalty under the said section is exig...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.