Habib Ahmad Son Of Ahmad Khan vs State Of U.P.
Judges: I Murtaza, R Yadav
10 May, 2005·4. In the opinion of the Doctor the patient was unconscious and gasping. His pulse and blood pressure were not recordable. All the injuries were kept under observation and the patient was admitted. The injuries appeared to have been caused by some blunt object. They were fresh. Smell of alcohol was ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Scientific Instrument Co. Ltd., A ... vs Bank Of India Through Its Branch ...
Judges: A Tandon
10 May, 2005·8. Since the Tribunal was proceeding to pass orders with regard to confirmation of sale the petitioner filed another Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 43 of 2005 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition so filled by the petitioner was disposed of with a direction upon the appell...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shri Abdul Majid vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
10 May, 2005·(3) The learned Income-tax Officer is wrong and unjustified in charging interest Under Section 139(8) and Section 217 as the interest is not chargeable at all, because the assessments are not regular assessments Under Section 2(40), but completed Under Section (3)/148. 3. The assessee vehemently arg...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sampurnand Sanskrit University ... vs State Of U.P., Through Its ...
Judges: S Ambwani
10 May, 2005·5. The Regional Committees under Section 20(1)(iii) of the Act were constituted on 6.1.1996. The regulations prescribing the standard for granting recognition were made on 29.12.1995 and published on 24.2.1996, and the institutions offering teachers training course were required to apply for recogni...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Amrit Banaspati Co. Ltd.
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
10 May, 2005·When the matter came up before the Tribunal, the Tribunal allowed interest under Section 7B of the Act. 3. We have heard learned standing counsel on behalf of the Revenue and Sri S.D. Singh, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee respondent. 4. Learned standing counsel submitted that si...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chairman, Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: A N Ray, A Bhushan
10 May, 2005·6. Under Section 37 of the 1975 Act it is provided as follows - "--employee of the Nigam-shall hold his office - upon same.....terms ........as he would have held the same on the appointed date, if this Act had not come into force,---". 7. Since all the Jal Nigam employees at the material time were ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Amrit Banaspati Co.
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
10 May, 2005·3. When the matter came up before the Tribunal, the Tribunal allowed interest under Section 7B of the Act. 4. We have heard learned standing counsel on behalf of the Revenue and Sri S.D. Singh, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee respondent. 5. Learned standing counsel submitted that...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Arun Maini vs New Okhla Industrial Development ...
Judges: P Srivastava
10 May, 2005·(8) Whether merely because the rent was being paid yearly, the tenancy would not be a month to month tenancy? (9) Whether after having accepted the rent sent by the plaintiff- appellant to the Defendant-respondent through Registered letter dated 1.6.1988 the tenancy of the appellant got further exte...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Arun Kumar Jain H.U.F. Through Its ... vs Sri Hari Wire And Wire Products ...
Judges: S Mehrotra
10 May, 2005·25. The Office submitted its Report dated 21.7.2003/4.8.2003/11.8.2003, interalia, stating that "neither A.D. nor undelivered cover has been returned back". 26. In view of the said Office Report, the Court passed an order dated 11.8.2003, interalia, directing that fresh notices be issued to the Resp...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Laxmi Transport Co. And Ors. vs Chief Operation Manager And Anr.
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
10 May, 2005·"14. It is trite law that Article 14 of the Constitution applies also to matters of governmental policy and if the policy or any action of the Government, even in contractual matters, fails to satisfy the test of reasonableness, it would be unconstitutional. 15. While the discretion to change the po...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.