Sudarshan Trading Company ... vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...
Judges: R Singh
22 March, 2005·(1) to issue an order or direction in the nature of writ of Certiorari quashing the order dated 20.12.2004 in Criminal Complaint Case No. 1825 of 2004 and another order dated 4.1.2005 in Criminal Complaint Case No. 2071 of 2003 between Surya enterprises v. Manoj Kumar Kesharwani and Ors. under Secti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Asray Bharti S/O Shyam Lal vs State Of U.P. Through Home ...
Judges: R Singh
22 March, 2005·2. This Petition has been filed against the order dated 17.8.2004, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Orail District Jalaun in Crl. Misc. Case No. 157 of 2003, whereby the final report submitted by the Investigating Officer was accepted and the protest petition filed by the petitioner was re...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cwt, Agra vs Shri Bhagwan Agarwal & Sons
Judges:
22 March, 2005·2. The present reference relates to the assessment years 1983-84 to 1986-87. 3. The respondent-assessee is a partner in a firm which owns a cinema building and claimed exemption under section 5(1)(iv) of the Act. The claim was not entertained by the assessing officer on the ground that the property ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Strong Construction Through Its ... vs State Of U.P. Through Finance ...
Judges: A Yog, B Agarwal
22 March, 2005·3. A Special Bench of this court in Hindustan Sugar Mills Ltd. v. State of U.P. and Ors., AIR 1972 All, 8, has laid down that a security bond is chargeable with a duty under Article 57 Schedule of the Stamp Act. A Special Bench of Delhi High Court in Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Marshal Pr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohan Lal Bagla Son Of Late Gopi ... vs Board Of Revenue And Ors.
Judges: S Singh
22 March, 2005·8. In respect to the question that whether a new counsel can file and argue review petition, learned advocates from both sides placed reliance on the decision given by the Apex Court in the case of Tamil Nadu Electricity Board v. N. Raju Reddiar JT 1997 (1) SC 486. 9. In view of aforesaid rival cont...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kushal Pal Singh Son Of Sri Chheddi ... vs State Of U.P. And Sri Harpal Singh ...
Judges: K Ojha
22 March, 2005·8. For appreciating the contention raised by the parties it would be necessary to reproduce Sections 138 and 142 of the Act, which are as under: 138. Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency, etc., of funds in the account- Where any cheque drawn by a person on an account maintained by him with a banker...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pramod Kumar S/O Late Kunwar Pal ... vs The Presiding Officer, Central ...
Judges: R Tiwari
22 March, 2005·4. The case of the petitioner before the Labour Court was that he was engaged from time to time in different branches of the Bank and had continuously worked w.e.f. 1.4.1985 to 20.3.1995 but he was illegally retrenched. It was also his case that his name was included in the panel of daily wagers of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Ramdei (Deceased) Through ... vs Smt. Rampati Alias Rupa Devi And ...
Judges: O Srivastava
22 March, 2005·7. During pendency of second appeal the consolidation proceedings have commenced in the village. Notification under Section 4(2) of U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (hereafter referred to as 'Act') has been admittedly issued during pendency of appeal. Due to commencement of consolidation pr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. Pradeep Kumar S/O Shri Radha ... vs Regional Ayurvedic/Unani ...
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
21 March, 2005·3. Shri C.K. Rai, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents has submitted that the apprehension of the petitioner is totally misconceived for the reason that "preference" does not mean rejection of the candidature of any other person; it comes into play only if other qualities of candid...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hridaya Shanker Mishra Son Of Sri ... vs State Of U.P. Through Its ...
Judges: S Kumar
21 March, 2005·4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner was appointed on the post of Lekhpal on 1.2.1979 and since the initial date of appointment, the petitioner is working continuously and the petitioner being a trained and experienced Lekhpal, working in the department from 1977,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.