Sant Vijay Singh And Ors. vs Ist A.D.J. And Ors.
Judges: M Prasad
09 March, 2005·4. Learned Judge, Small Causes held that on 5.9.1986 the defendant appeared in the Court and prayed for time for filing written statement and as such 5.9.1986 was the first date of hearing of the suit. Since the entire amount of rent, etc. as provided under Sub-section (4) of Section 20 of Uttar Pra...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs Pratibha Chhabigrih
Judges:
09 March, 2005·2. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present reference are as follows: 2. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present reference are as follows: The reference relates to the assessment years 1982-83 and 1983-84. The respondent-assessee is a partnership firm. It is engaged in the bus...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Babu Lal And Ors. Through Its ... vs Director Of Income-Tax ...
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
09 March, 2005·9. The question is whether the search and seizure in this case has been conducted in consonance with the provisions of the Act and, if not, to what relief the petitioner is entitled to. 10. The issues involved herein are no more res-integra. A Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in M. Ct...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bharat Lal Son Of Late Bahraich, ... vs State Of U.P. Through Its ...
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
09 March, 2005·"It is now well settled that the power to suspend, in the sense of a right to forbid to work, is not an implied term in an ordinary contract between master and servant, and that such a power can only be the creature either by the Statute governing the contract, or of an express term in the contract ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit, Kanpur vs Champaran Sugar Co. Ltd.
Judges:
09 March, 2005·2. Bri efly stated the facts giving rise to the present case are as follows : 2. Bri efly stated the facts giving rise to the present case are as follows : The reference relates to the assessment years 1979-80 and 1980-8 1. The assessee-respondent is a limited company eaming its income from the manu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Viresh Kumar Tiwari vs Zila Sahkari Bank Ltd. And Ors.
Judges: D Gupta
07 March, 2005·7. The first contention of Dr. H.N. Tripathi, learned Counsel for the petitioner is that the charge-sheet dated 2.3.1995 was never served upon the petitioner and, therefore, the entire proceedings culminating in the dismissal order dated 8.5.2003 are bad in law. According to him, though it has been ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Prem Nath Son Of Late Ganga Ram ... vs State Of U.P. Through Its District ...
Judges: R Tiwari
07 March, 2005·2. This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 16.3.2002 (Annexure-4 to the writ petition) passed by respondent No. 2, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Chunar, District Mirzapur and for a direction in the nature...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Manohar Lal Son Of Late Sri Bihari ... vs State Of U.P., Additional ...
Judges: R Tiwari
07 March, 2005·2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition for quashing the order passed by the Commissioner (Administration), Bareilly dated 1.11.99 and the order of the District Magistrate, Pilibhit dated 26.8.98 cancelling the fisheries lease granted to the petitioner on 20.7.96 in exercise of power under Se...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Usha Bansal And Anr. vs Smt. Premwati And Ors.
Judges: A Kumar
07 March, 2005·1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners-tenant is directed against the order dated 20th January, 1997, passed by the prescribed authority under the provisions of the U. P. Act No. XIII of 1972 directing release of the accommodation in question, w...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Basti Sugar Mills Company ... vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh, ...
Judges: R Tiwari
07 March, 2005·7. Counsel for the petitioner submits that from the perusal of the order of reference as well as letter dated 5.2.1988 it is evident that the petitioner was a supervisor and not a workman. It is also submitted that there is no finding by the Labour Court that respondent No. 3 had worked continuously...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.