Ram Das And Budh Ram Sons Of Sita Ram vs State Of U.P. And Special Land ...
Judges: R Misra, A Sahi
10 March, 2005·2. We have heard Sri Radhey Shyam, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 3. This Court had directed the petitioners to file a copy off the order dated 5.2.1990 whereby the application moved by the petitioners under Section 18 of the Act had been reject...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Krishna Kumar And Bros.
Judges: R Agrawal, K Ojha
10 March, 2005·Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally justified in holding that the expenditure of Rs. 1,41,468 in the Delhi set and Rs. 2,80,934 in the Moradabad set which was incurred on prize coupons was not covered by the provisions of Section 37(3A) of IT Act, 196...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiv Charan Singh (D.) Through ... vs Xith A.D.J. And Ors.
Judges: M Prasad
10 March, 2005·6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, learned Judge, Small Causes found that summons sent through the process server and postman was refused by tenant-petitioner and he had notice of the suit. Moreover, the application was barred by limitation. He, therefore, rejected the application...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Som Pal Singh S/O Shri Mahinder ... vs State Of U.P. Through The ...
Judges: R Misra, A Sahi
10 March, 2005·2. We have examined the provisions of The Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Societies (Thirty Eight Amendment) Rules, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as 'Rule'), the vires whereof has been challenged by means of the present writ petition. 3. A perusal of Rule 459 of the Rule would indicate that the same is a ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Narendra Yadav Son Of Shri Saudan ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: R Singh
10 March, 2005·3. It is contended that the order dated 20.1.2005 is illegal by which the application for the release of the petitioner, was rejected, on the ground that the non-production of the petitioner by the police within 24 hours, would not be rendered his detention illegal, so the petitioner was not entitle...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ravindra Prakash vs Prescribed Authority And Anr.
Judges: A Kumar
09 March, 2005·1. The petitioner, who is tenant of the accommodation in question, has challenged the order dated 16th February, 2005, passed by the prescribed authority under the provisions of U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). in P.A. Case No. 5 of 2004 whereby a substitution applicatio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Committee Of Management, A.S. ... vs Vice-Chancellor, Choudhary ...
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
09 March, 2005·1. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 14.2.2005 passed by the learned Vice-Chancellor of the respondent No. 1 University. 2. The matter has been decided by the learned Vice-chancellor on the presumption that the Committee of Management which had passed the order of suspen...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Krishna Kumar Jaiswal S/O Shri ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh Through Its ...
Judges: A Bhushan
09 March, 2005·4. That the lease has been granted to respondent No. 4 under Chapter II by order dated 21.6.2004 without there being any notice as provided under Rule 72 of the Rules hence the grant is illegal. 5. That by the Government order dated 28.2.2004 the State Government directed for grant of lease under Ch...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Gupta Cold Storage
Judges: R Agarwal, P Krishna
09 March, 2005·6. In this connection learned Standing Counsel placed strong reliance upon the Full Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Additional Commissioner of Income tax v. Uttam Kumar Pramod Kumar ( 1978) 115 I.T.R. 796. We have carefully considered the said decision and we find that it has hardly any ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sanjai Kumar Son Of Chhunni Lal vs The Collector/District ...
Judges: S Khan
09 March, 2005·3. Whenever a new cut off date for conferring benefit of Section 122-B(4-F) of the Act is provided, people belonging to scheduled caste start claiming benefit of the said Section by creating evidence of prior possession. In view of this rampant mal-practice it is most essential that whenever benefit...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.