Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Ganesh Dass And Sons (P) Ltd.
Judges: R Agrawal, P Krishna
15 March, 2005·3. We have heard Shri A.N. Mahajan, learned standing counsel for the Revenue. Nobody has appeared on behalf of the respondent/assessee and have perused the report of the surveyor, which has been made part of the statement of case and also the order of the Tribunal. 4. Sri A.N. Mahajan, learned stand...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Committee Of Management Of Janta ... vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: J Sahai
14 March, 2005·3. The decision of the Joint Director of Education dated 22.10.2003 was again challenged in Writ Petition No. 48710 of 2003 by the respondent No. 4, Dharamveer Singh. The writ petition was allowed by the judgment and order dated 8.10.2004. It was held that the election of Naresh Pal Singh could not ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ghanshyam Singh Son Of Mahendra ... vs State Of U.P. Through Its ...
Judges: S Khan
14 March, 2005·JUDGMENT S.U. Khan, J. 1. In Sanjai Kumar v. Collector Writ Petition No. 13191 of 2005 connected with two other writ petitions decided on 9.3.03 I have held that provision of Section 122-B(4-F) of U.P.Z.A.L.R. Act which regularizes unauthorized occupation of scheduled caste agricultural labourer ove...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Registrar Of Companies vs Kamal Infosys Ltd. And Ors.
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
14 March, 2005·9. The first proviso enables the Hon'ble Chief Justice to fix the territorial jurisdiction of the Lucknow Bench. However, second proviso confers the power to take away the jurisdiction of the Lucknow Bench in any case or class of cases arising in the said area, and to confer the same upon the Allaha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sri Ram S/O Darshan, Smt. Budhani ... vs Board Of Revenue And Ors.
Judges: S Khan
14 March, 2005·1. Proceedings for cancellation of pattas granted to the petitioners have been instituted under Section 198(4) of U.P.Z.A.L.R. Act. The case has been registered as Case No. 64/00-01. 2. Petitioners raised plea of limitation. A.D.M. (Admn.), Allahabad through order dated 22.11.01 directed that the pl...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bulaki Son Of Dal Singar vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ...
Judges: R Singh
14 March, 2005·2. This Writ Petition has been filed against the order dated 10.8.2004, passed by the learned S.D.M. Sagri, District Azamgarh, in Crl. Case No. 33 of 2004 Bulaki v. Dhanju and Anr., whereby the property in dispute was attached under Section 146(1) Cr.P.C. and further it was directed that the propert...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sunil Garg S/O Late Shyam Lal Garg vs The State Of U.P.
Judges: U Pandey
14 March, 2005·4.The Investigating Officer (PW 8) conducted the entire investigation, visited the spot, recorded the statements of the witnesses and after its completion, submitted the charge sheet against the appellant accused. The Investigating Officer, PW 8 had concluded after whole investigation that Smt. Sush...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kehari Singh Son Of Shri Ambika ... vs The State Of U.P. And Smt. Rekha ...
Judges: R Singh
11 March, 2005·4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the impugned order dated 12.03.2001 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Kalpi recalling the order dated 22.8.2000 and restoring the case and the order dated 22.06.2001 passed by learned III Addl. Sessions Judge, Jalaun at Orai are ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Awadh Son Of Raghuveer Prasad vs State Of U.P., Station Officer, ...
Judges: R Singh
11 March, 2005·4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant was also named in the F.I.R. along with other co-accuse persons, but during the investigation the I.O. came to conclusion that he was falsely implicated, so no charge sheet was submitted against him, but the charge sheet ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs I.B. Nigam
Judges:
11 March, 2005·"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the incentive bonus paid to Development Officer of Life Insurance Corporation of India is not chargeable to the tax under the head 'Salary'? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstanc...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.