The Commissioner, Trade Tax vs S/S Ankit Glass Industries Pvt. ...
Judges: R Kumar
18 March, 2005·4. Entry No. 4 of notification No. ST-5784/X-10(2) 80-U.P. Act 15-84-Order-81, dated 07.09.1981 reads as follows: "4. All goods and wares made of glass but not including plain glass panes, optical lenses, hurricane lantern chimneys, bottles and phials, glass heads, clinical syringes, thermometers an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vijay Bahadur Pandey Son Of Deobi ... vs The State Of U.P. Through ...
Judges: R Singh
18 March, 2005·3. The facts in brief of this writ petition are that an application under Section 156(3) Cr. P. C. was filed by respondent No. 4 Jai Nath Singh in the court of learned C.J.M., Mau with a prayer to issue a direction to police station concerned to register the case and investigate the same. On that ap...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cwt, Agra vs Smt. Shand Devi Agarwal
Judges:
18 March, 2005·"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal erred in law in holding that the assessee HUF was entitled to the exemption under section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 in respect of its share in the value of immovable property belonging to the partnership f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ravi Prakash Agarwal Son Of Late ... vs State Of U.P. Through Special ...
Judges: R Kumar
18 March, 2005·5. In my opinion argument of learned counsel for the petitioner has no force. Issue involved in the present case is squarely covered by the Division Bench decision of this Court in the case of Sarju Chitra Mandir, Ballia and Anr. v. Commissioner of Enterainment Tax, Lucknow and Ors., reported in 199...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Supdt. Engineer, U.P.S.E.B. And ... vs The Presiding Officer, Labour ...
Judges: R Tiwari
18 March, 2005·Dt. 14.12.1984 Sd/- Illigible" 3. Brief facts of the case are that U.P. State Electricity Board (for short 'UPSEB') is an autonomous body constituted under the provisions of Electricity Supply Act, 1948 for the purposes of distribution, generation and transmission of the electrical energy to the con...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Wilson Diesels (P) Ltd. Through ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through ...
Judges: R Kumar
18 March, 2005·(5) A penalty of Rs. 50,000/- was imposed on Wilson Diesel P. Ltd. under Rule 209-A of Central Excise Rules, 1944 and (6) A penalty of Rs. 50,000/- was imposed under Pule 209-A of Central Excise Rules, 1944 on Sarvasri G.K. Agarwal, A.K. Agarwal and Suit Manju Rani Agarwal Ddirectors/partners of M/S...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Fakharuddin Son Of Abdul Mazid vs Nagar Palika Parishad Through Its ...
Judges: V Saran
18 March, 2005·JUDGMENT Vineet Saran, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Prem Chandra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner does not wish to f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chabi Nath Son Of Sarju Prasad vs State Of U.P. Through Its ...
Judges: A Yog, B Agarwal
17 March, 2005·7. No counter affidavit has been filed even today. Averments made in writ petition stand unrebutted. 8. Learned Standing Counsel has, however, submitted that in view of the relief claimed in the writ petition, (as noted above) the petitioner cannot claim benefit of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regula...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Doodhnath And Anr. vs Deonandan Represented By L.Rs. ...
Judges: S Srivastava
17 March, 2005·(2) Whether the first appellate court was justified in dismissing the suit on the theory of partition in the family whereas the defendants failed to adduce any evidence to the effect that the family was common and joint; that the land in question was the ancestral property of the family and the same...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chhata Sugar Company Ltd., ... vs The Presiding Officer, Labour ...
Judges: R Tiwari
17 March, 2005·Sd/- (K.P.Singh) Executive Director" 4. At the time of appointment, the factory of petitioner-company was already under construction which had started in the year 1974 and continued till February, 1978. The factory was commissioned during season 1977-78 and period of trial was 27.2.1978 to 27.5.1978...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.