The Senior Divisional Manager, ... vs Presiding Officer, Central ...
Judges: D Singh
19 July, 2005·2. Heard Learned Counsel for the parties. 3. This Writ Petition is directed against an award of the labour court dated 19.7.1996 holding that the dismissal of the workman was illegal and as such he was entitled for reinstatement with full backwages. 4. Hira Lal Srivastava, the respondent workman, wh...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ismail And Anr. vs Zahir Ahmad And Ors.
Judges: P Srivastava
19 July, 2005·"Because the court below further failed to consider that the plea of fraud raised in the suit was neither matter in issue nor the same was heard and decided by the Court while deciding the restoration application and in the absence of the existence of condition precedent for invocation of the princi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. State Road Transport ... vs The State Of U.P., The Presiding ...
Judges: D Singh
18 July, 2005·2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. This writ petition is directed against an award of the labour court dated 28. October, 1989 by which the order of removal of the respondent workman has been held to be improper and he has been directed to be reinstated with backwages. 4. The respondent wo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mata Deen Son Of Late Chandi vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ...
Judges: T Agarwala
18 July, 2005·4. The petitioner has mow challenged the order of termination as well as the order by which his representation had been rejected. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order of termination was passed in violation of Article 311 of the Constitution of India and in support of his su...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
A.H.S. Projects Pvt. Ltd. vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
18 July, 2005·8. As regard the submission made on behalf of the petitioner regarding the directions of the State Government contained in the communication dated 6-1-1997 it was submitted that they do not confer any right upon the petitioner to claim any relief as was held by this Court in Civil Misc. Writ Petitio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Udai Kumar Verma Son Of Sri Kamla ... vs State Of U.P. Through The Director ...
Judges: A Yog, B Agarwal
18 July, 2005·The grievance of the petitioner is that in spite of direction of this Court the respondents has not advertised the auction in well known newspapers having wide circulation and they had only published in the newspaper 'Dainik Jagran' dated 14.2.99. The respondents are directed to advertise the tender...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shri Bal Kishan Agrawal, Glass ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through The ...
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
18 July, 2005·"11.06. The safety and security of the metering skid alongwith its associated piping and accessories as installed by the SELLER at the premises of the BUYER for the purposes of gas supply shall be the sole exclusive responsibility of the BUYER. The BUYER undertakes that there would not be any damage...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhanwar Pal Singh S/O Sri Genda Lal ... vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ...
Judges: T Agarwala
18 July, 2005·2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present writ petition is that the petitioner was working as a Sub Inspector and on account of three adverse entries was compulsory retired from the service on 14.5.1990, The petitioner filed Civil Writ Petition No. 13578 of 1990 and, initially an inter...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Virendra Prasad Dubey Son Of Raj ... vs The Senior Divisional Security ...
Judges: V Misra
18 July, 2005·(d) Reduction in rank or grade. 148.3 Minor punishments: (a) Reduction to a lower stage in the existing, scale of pay. (b) Withholding of next increment with or without corresponding postponement of subsequent increments (c) Withholding of promotion for a specified period. (d) Removal from any offic...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jahar Singh Son Of Ram Dayal vs Board Of Revenue And Ors.
Judges: S Khan
18 July, 2005·4. It appears that a particular plot of land is adjacent to road (National High Way) hence each party is very much keen to have that plot in his Kura (lot). The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant in the review petition is that the said plot is in exclusive possession of the p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.