Baldev Raj vs Rakesh Kumar Mittal And Anr.
Judges: A Kumar
07 July, 2005·4. The brief facts of the case are that before the prescribed authority the landlord filed an application under Section 21(1)(a) of U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) which has been registered as P.A. Case No. 23 of 2003. When the application came up before the prescribed a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Chhakko Devi Wife Of Bharat ... vs Director General, Medical Health ...
Judges: S Ambwani
07 July, 2005·2. It is admitted in the counter affidait that the petitioner Smt. Chhako Devi was appointed as Part; Time Cook. after interview by Departmental Selection Committee, by the then Chief Medical Officer, Varanasi on 21.12.1987 on consolidated pay of Rs. 350/-per month, and that since then she is workin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhagwan Deen Verma, Son Of Sri ... vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ...
Judges: A Tandon
06 July, 2005·14786-00 #i;s dks ?kVkus ds mijkUr #i;s 6580-00 dk nq#i;ksx ik;k x;kA Li"V gS fd dk;Z dh xq.koÙkk Hkh izHkkfor gq;h bl izdkj vkjksi la[;k&1 iw.kZr;k fl} ik;k x;kA** Charge No. 2. ^^iz/kku }kjk fn;s x;s Li"Vhdj.k ls mijksDrkuqlkj lger ugha gwa bl lEcU/k esa tkap vf/kdkjh }kjk djk;k x;k ewY;kadu ds vu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax vs Nidhipati Singhania
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
06 July, 2005·2. The present reference relates to the assessment year 1978-79. 3. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present reference are as follows : 4. The respondent-assessee is an individual. He has been assessed to wealth-tax for the assessment year in question. He had filed his return of wealth de...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kanpur Metal Products Private ... vs Saveena Enterprises Private ...
Judges: S Mehrotra
06 July, 2005·7. During the pendency of the aforesea company Application No. 19 of 2003, various applications along with affidavits were filed on behalf of the Applicants-Companies . Last of such applications filed on behalf of the Applicants-Companies was an " application dated 31.8.2004 being Civil Misc. Applic...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shyam Sunder Agrawal vs Smt. Gyanwati Devi And Anr.
Judges: A Kumar
06 July, 2005·1. By means of present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who is said to be in occupation of the accommodation in dispute, has challenged the order passed by the Rent Control and Eviction Officer, Aligarh, whereby a vacancy has been declared in the accommod...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
St. Mary'S School Thru It'S ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And The ...
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
06 July, 2005·4. Section 6 of the Act reads as follows: "6. Additional tax on public service vehicle- (1) Save as otherwise provided in this Act or the rules made thereunder, no public service vehicle, other than those owned or controlled by the State Transport undertaking shall be operated in a any public place ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sri Bapu Lal Mansukh Lal Thakkar ... vs The Additional District Judge And ...
Judges: S Yadav
06 July, 2005·18. In J. Gopanna v. K. Ramaswami, reported in AIR 1944 Madras 416, it was held by the Court that there may be an exclusive right of worship in a class of persons in a particular temple or a Particular part of temple . a suit will lie for joining in such worship. For ready reference the relevant ext...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Srikanti Nishad Wife Of Sri ... vs State Of U.P. Through Its Special ...
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
06 July, 2005·4. Learned Standing Counsel, on the other hand, submitted that in view of the subsequent Government Order dated 27th August, 2002, the mining lease could not have been granted in favour of the petitioner merely on account of the fact that she had discovered the mining area and even the subsequent Go...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Himalaya Cutlery Works
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
05 July, 2005·4. The CIT (A) accepted the arguments raised on behalf of the assessee and directed the ITO to allow deduction Under Section 80HHC as claimed by the assessee in the following words :- "I have carefully considered the submissions made before me. Having regards to the fact that export incentive receiv...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.