Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Alankar Bottling Co.
Judges: R Agrawal, P Krishna
31 January, 2005·2. Whether, on the face of specific provisions of law contained in Section 32(2) and Section 75 of the IT Act, 1961, the Tribunal was justified in upholding the order of CIT(A) ? 3. Whether the Tribunal was legally correct in holding that the issue, whether unabsorbed depreciation has to be allowed ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Himalaya Cold Storage And Iron ...
Judges: R Agrawal, P Krishna
31 January, 2005·2. The reference relates to the Assessment Year 1979-80. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present reference are as follows:- The respondent assessee is running a cold storage. It claimed investment allowance with regard to the cold storage which was accepted by the Assessing Officer whil...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bashir Ahmad Khan (D.) Through ... vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation ...
Judges: K Murari
31 January, 2005·5. In reply, it has been urged on behalf of the respondent that by the impugned order the earlier order dated 21.7.1982, passed on the revision of the respondent No. 4 was recalled and the same has not been challenged by her and the petitioner cannot be permitted to hold brief of respondent No. 4 an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Sushila Devi vs Nagar Palika Parishad And Anr.
Judges: R Agrawal, P Krishna
31 January, 2005·"147. Amendment and alteration of list.-(1) The board may at any time alter or amend the assessment list : (a)... (b)... (c) ... (d) by revaluing or reassessing any property the value of which has been increased by additions or alteration to buildings; or (e) ... (f)... (g)... (2) ... (3) ... (4) Ev...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Srimati Ram Rati Wife Of Shri Ram ... vs The State
Judges: I Murtaza, M Chaudhary
31 January, 2005·3. Incised wound 2 cm x 1/2 cm x bone cut at left index finger. 4. Abrasion 2 cm x 1 cm on right side forehead. 5. On internal examination all the organs were found pale. The doctor opined that the death was caused due to shock and haemorrhage as a result of ante mortem injury No. 1 about one and ha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chief Commissioner (Admn.) vs Rohelkhand Foods (P) Ltd.
Judges: R Agrawal, P Krishna
31 January, 2005·Whether in law and on the facts of the case, the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) relating to investment allowance under Section 32A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which has been upheld by the Tribunal is correct in law? 2. The present reference relates to the assessment year 1980-81. 3. Briefly sta...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Singhpal Singh Son Of Lal Singh ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: I Murtaza, M Chaudhary
31 January, 2005·5. On internal examination frontal, left parietal, temporal and occipital bones were found fractured and brain and its membranes lacerated and base of the skull fractured. Stomach contained 3 oz semi digested food material. The doctor removed four deformed pellets from inside the head injury. 6. The...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kasturi Lal Dewan & Sons. vs Cit
Judges:
31 January, 2005·The reference relates to the assessment year 1985-86 made at the instance of Jagdish Chand and Sons and Kasturi Lal Dewan and Sons. The applicants are HUF and they had claimed deduction under section 80C of the Act after making investment taken out of loan. It may be mentioned here that the investme...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sultan Leather Finishers (P.) ... vs A.D.J. And Ors.
Judges: D P Singh
31 January, 2005·7. Learned Counsel for the respondents further submits that any order made or deciding an issue shall be amenable to revisional power of the High Court. Accordingly, on account of availability of statutory alternative remedy the writ petition is not maintainable. 8. Shri Manish Kumar, learned Counse...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sushil Kumar Singh Son Of Shri Udai ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
31 January, 2005·2. This petition has been filed against the orders dated 26.8.2004 and 20.1.2005 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi. 3. It is contended that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. of case Crime No. 238 of 2004, under Sections 302, 307 and 120B I.P.C. and Section 7 of the Cri...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.