Umesh @ Ummi Son Of Jaggu Ahirwar ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: K Sinha
25 February, 2005·1. Heard Sri. Pulak Ganguli holding brief on behalf of Sri I.K. Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Prashant Kumar holding brief on behalf of Sri Niraj Tripathi, learned counsel for the complainant, learned A.G.A, perused the F.I.R, Post mortem report and rejecting the bail. 2. The le...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Baboo Ram Son Of Chhotey Lal And ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ...
Judges: R Singh
25 February, 2005·2. This petition has been filed against the order dated 05.03.2003 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad in Criminal Complaint Case No. 265 of 2003, Shiv Shankar v. Babu Ram and Ors. taking the cognizance and summoning the petitioners to face the trial for the offences punishable ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gulam Mohammad Son Of Munna ... vs Chuttan Son Of Rahim Bux And Ors.
Judges: P Krishna
25 February, 2005·5. He has placed reliance on few cases to show that an amendment which has effect of taking away admission of a party cannot be allowed. To meet the. point that the revision was not maintainable as held by the Supreme Court in the case of Prem Buxy and Ors. v. Dharm Dev and Ors. AIR 2002 S.C. 559, i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hemant Singh Son Of Sri Ram Pal ... vs Adhyaksha, Zila Panchayat Etah ...
Judges: V Saran
25 February, 2005·2. After the disposal of the writ petition filed by Zila Panchayat, the Chairman of the Zila Panchayat passed an order dated 3.7.2004 directing that in compliance of the judgment of this Court dated 18.3.2004 passed in writ petition No. 30805 of 1998 the petitioner would be treated in service on the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Pushpa @ Pooja @ Bhawna W/O ... vs State Of U.P., District Judge And ...
Judges: A Bhushan
25 February, 2005·8. Section 28 of the Act as amended by the Act No. 68 of 1976 provides for appeal from decrees and orders. Section 28(2) provides that the orders made by the court in any proceeding under the Act under Section 25 or 26 shall be appealable if they are not interim orders. From the provisions of Sectio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramesh Rai vs Chairman, S.K.G. Bank And Ors.
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
25 February, 2005·11. The result of interview itself on merit, cannot be successfully challenged by a candidate who get a chance to be selected in the interview. It is thus held that these writ petitions, challenging the criterion for promotion, are not maintainable at the instance of candidates who have participated...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Riyaj Fatma (Smt.) vs Special Judge/Additional ...
Judges: M Prasad
25 February, 2005·8. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has assailed the impugned judgments mainly on the grounds that the provisions of the Act do not apply to the shop in question and the Courts below committed illegality in recording a finding that the Act applies to the shop in dispute. The Full Bench decision of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashok Singh And Ors. vs Nizamul Islam Alias Musa And Anr.
Judges: S Srivastava
25 February, 2005·3. It would appear from a perusal of the record that no substantial question was pressed into service at the time of admission of the appeal nor has this Court put forth any substantial question for determination. 4. Sri Vinay Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the appellants raised three-fold arg...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Krishna Pathak Wife Of Late ... vs Vinod Shankar Tiwari Son Of Dev ...
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
25 February, 2005·10. The expression 'any other sufficient reason' contained in Order 47 Rule 1 CPC means "sufficient reason" which is analogous to those specified immediately to it in the provision of Order 47 Rule 1 CPC. 11. In Chhajju Ram v. Neki and Ors, AIR 1922 PC 112, it was held by the Privy Council that anol...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shobha Nath Dubey S/O Sri Badree ... vs Managing Director, U.P. Sahakari ...
Judges: V Saran
24 February, 2005·2. The dispute in the present writ petition is with regard to the date of birth of the petitioner who was an employee of U.P.Sahkari Gram Vikas Bank Limited. The petitioner joined the service of the Bank in the year 1967. He passed high school examination in the year 1981, while in service. His date...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.