Gopal Krishna Shukla S/O Shri Daya ... vs State Of U.P. Through District And ...
Judges: R Singh
16 February, 2005·3. The facts of the case giving rise to this petition, in brief, are that on 5.9.2005, the respondent No. 5 submitted a Challani report in the court of learned A.C.M.-I, Kanpur Nagar and a case was registered as Case No. 1167 of 2004 State v. Gopal shukla and Ors. under Sections 107, 116 and 151 Cr....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Umesh Chandra Son Of Uma Datt Dubey vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: T Agarwala
16 February, 2005·7. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the reasons recorded for dispensing with the inquiry was irrelevant and was arbitrary and therefore, the impugned order of termination was invalid and that the petitioners were therefore, liable to be reinstated in service. 8. The services of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Devendra Kumar Arora Son Of Mohan ... vs Additional District Judge, ...
Judges: A Tandon
16 February, 2005·5. On behalf of the petitioners it is contended that they are bona fide purchasers of the property during the subsistence of the judgment and decree dated 18th May, 1987, which was passed in the Original Suit No. 145 of 1987 initiated by Smt. Ataro Devi against her husband, Sri Prakash and therefore...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dinesh Chandra Jain vs Civil Judge, Junior Division And ...
Judges: A Kumar
16 February, 2005·1. Heard Sri P. K. Jain, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Rajiv Ratan Singh, who has accepted notice on behalf of respondent No. 2. Sri Singh has made a statement that since he does not want to file any counter- affidavit, therefore the matter may be heard on merits. In ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Committee Of Management, Kisan ... vs Chaudhary Charan Singh ...
Judges: V Shukla
16 February, 2005·3. Counter-affidavit has been filed on behalf of Kanak Singh, and therein much stress has been laid on the fact that petitioners have tried to practice fraud, and further that University has no authority or jurisdiction to amend the bye-laws of the society. Much stress has also been laid on the fact...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shri Ranjan S/O Late Kanhaiya ... vs The District Inspector Of ...
Judges: T Agarwala
16 February, 2005·4. Instead of approving the appointment of the petitioners, the District Inspector of Schools, by the impugned order, has again refused to grant financial approval on the appointment of the petitioners. This time, the District Inspector of Schools had rejected the appointment of the petitioners on t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mata Prasad Jaiswal vs Ashish Kumar Shah And Ors.
Judges: A Kumar
16 February, 2005·3. So far as question of maintainability of the revision against the order dismissing the application by the Rent Control and Eviction Officer for summoning Smt. Sudha Rani Jaiswal is concerned it is conceded by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that no revision lies under Section 18 of the Act...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Brij Mohan Aggarwal, Advocate, ... vs State Of U.P. Through Senior ...
Judges: R Singh
16 February, 2005·1. Heard Sri Rajendra Kumar Pandey and Dr. Archana Pandey learned counsels for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. 2. It is contended by the learned counsels for the petitioner that he lodged an F.I.R. against the respondents No. 5 to 7. The matter was investigated by the police. The I.O. came to conc...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Provisional Medical Service'S ... vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: P Kant, P Chatterji
16 February, 2005·4. The grievance of the petitioner's Association is two-fold namely; that on the one hand the State Government of its own stayed the implementation of the provisions of the said transfer policy regarding transfer of physically handicapped officers and on the other hand in the same transfer policy pa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Melvin Powell Vanasapati And ... vs Oswal Chemicals Fertilisers Ltd. ...
Judges: S Mehrotra
15 February, 2005·List on 9th December, 2004, peremptorily." 12. On 9th December 2004, the case was listed peremptorily. 13. Learned counsel for the Petitioner-Company was present. However, the learned counsel for the Respondent-Company was not present. 14. In the circumstances, the case was directed to be listed per...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.