In Re: Jogi Son Of Ram Murat Mishra ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: M Jain, K Ojha
28 February, 2005·8. Abrasion 1/4" x 1/4" on right side neck, 1" below injury no. 7. 9. Multiple abrasion in area 5" x 1" on the left side and middle of neck just above the left collar bone and the sternal notch. 10. 7" x 1/4" size abrasion encircling back and sides of the neck on lower part back of the neck. 11. Con...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hanuman @ Mane vs District Judge And Ors.
Judges: A Kumar
28 February, 2005·2. It is admitted at the Bar that the petitioner has not filed any application for leave of the Court to file revision because he was not party to the proceedings which is sought to be challenged by means of the present writ petition, the Apex Court, in the decision reported in, AIR 1971 SC 374, Smt...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Star Paper Mills Limited vs The Labour Court, Designated ...
Judges: R Tiwari
28 February, 2005·8. Sri V.B. Singh, Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Vijay Sinha, Counsel for the petitioner assailed the impugned award on two grounds, firstly, that since the punishment of termination of the services of the workman was proportionate to the gravity of misconduct committed by him, the Labour Court h...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bahadur Singh Son Of Yadram vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: R Singh
28 February, 2005·2. This petition is filed against the order dated 28.8.2004 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Firozabad whereby the application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner was treated as complaint and the police station concerned was not directed to register the case and inve...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Khalida Begum W/O Shri Hasan ... vs State Of U.P. (Through Secretary) ...
Judges: A Tandon
28 February, 2005·(c) that the petitioner has not been debarred from contesting the elections in future by any order under Section 5 (a) of the Panchayat Raj Act, therefore, the petitioner was not in arrears of any dues payable by her as the Gram Panchayat. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gon...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sadaphal Singh Alias Angnu Singh, ... vs Hirday Narain Singh Son Of Late Sri ...
Judges: S Srivastava
28 February, 2005·3. Defendants denied plaint allegation and urged that both (defendant No. 1 and plaintiff) are real brothers and are co-tenants to the extent of one half share. They denied any private partition and also said that there is no reference of any division bf holding in revenue record. Defendant No. 2 pu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Gurdass Ram And Co.
Judges: R Agrawal, P Krishna
28 February, 2005·2. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present reference are as under : 3. The. reference relates to the assessment year 1984-85. The respondent-assessee is a registered partnership firm. It had entered into an agreement some time in January 1973, with M/s. Co-operative Co. Limited, Nawab-ga...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Surya Kant Ojha Son Of Dr. Vijay ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ...
Judges: S Ambwani
28 February, 2005·(1) The MCI and the Directorate General of Medical Education of U.P. to work out a solution in such a manner that all the students be accommodated in respect of whom directions have been given in these -matters in respective colleges in the second professional examination. (2) The seats that have to...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. Bheem Rao Ambedkar Degree ... vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: D P Singh
25 February, 2005·(3) Subject to the superintendence of the Academic Council and to the provisions of sub section (5), the Admission Committee shall lay down the principles or norms governing the policy of admission to various courses of studies in the University and may also nominate a person or a sub-Committee as t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Mohan Srivastava vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: V Shukla
25 February, 2005·(iii) Educational qualification, eligibility and experience of work of teaching and non-teaching staff are different and therefore, they cannot be placed at par with each other. 4. It has further been asserted that amendment in Chapter III of Regulation 21 of U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 ha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.