Durga Chand S/O Shitala Chand, ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: M Prasad
15 December, 2005·6. In the opinion of Dr. Mehta, injuries No. 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10 and 11 were simple. Injury No. 2 was dangerous. Injuries No. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 and 8 were caused by sharp edged weapons, including Pharsa. Injury No. 6 was grievous and remaining injuries were caused by lathies. Dr. Mehta advised X-ray of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Kundan Alias Utkarsh And Anusheel ...
Judges: M Jain, M Chaudhary
14 December, 2005·The cause of death could not be ascertained. Viscera was preserved. The viscera report ultimately disclosed the presence of aluminium phosphide poison. The deceased was carrying a male foetus of about 5 months. 4. The prosecution, in support of its case, examined Chandrawati Gaur informant PW 1, her...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Saira Begum Wife Of Mohd. Iqbal vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ...
Judges: A Lala, S Shanker
14 December, 2005·1. Petitioner has contended before this Court that she has purchased the property and she has no association with the alleged gangsters, her brothers. She or her husband is separate assessee under the Income Tax Act. Therefore, the property cannot be attached. Learned Government Advocate appeared an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raghuram Grah Pvt. Ltd. Through ... vs Income Tax Officer Vi(2), ...
Judges: A Yog, P Krishna
14 December, 2005·7. During the course of pendency of writ petition, a supplementary affidavit along with application dated 7.9.2005 was filed by the petitioner stating therein that after passing of the impugned order dated 22.12.2004 no notice whatsoever was served or tendered upon the petitioners. It has been furth...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. vs Amar Singh Son Of Sri Total Ram
Judges: M Jain, V Prasad
14 December, 2005·5. The trial court after discussing the evidence and by critical appreciation of the same came to the conclusion that the prosecution had failed to bring home the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt and consequently it acquitted the accused respondent of the charge. Hence the appeal. 6. We ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kanpur Electricity Supply Co. ... vs The Presiding Officer, Labour ...
Judges: S Kumar
14 December, 2005·5. Sri Ranjit Saxena, who appeared for the petitioner has submitted that a contract labour engaged through contractor has got no right for reinstatement, as he is not engaged by the petitioner. He was engaged through contractor. Reliance has been placed upon Steel Authority of India Ltd. and Ors. v....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Committee Of Management, Handia ... vs State Of U.P. Through The ...
Judges: A Tandon
14 December, 2005·9. On 3rd September, 2003 and on 15th October, 2003 permanently, the Handia Post Graduate degree college has been granted temporary affiliation for M.Ed. Course as well as for B.P.Ed. Course by the Purvanchal University. At no point of time any objection was raised with regard to the Handia Post Gra...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagatguru Shankaracharya, ... vs A.D.J., Special Judge And Anr.
Judges: V Mishra
14 December, 2005·7. Computation of Fees payable in certain suits. (iv-B) In suits-- (a) For easement--for a right to some benefit (not herein otherwise provided for) to arise out of land ; (b) For an injunction--to obtain an injunction ; (c) To establish an adoption -- to establish an adoption or to obtain a declara...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Road Transport Corporation ... vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court ...
Judges: D Singh
14 December, 2005·2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Standing Counsel for respondent No. 1 and perused the record. None has appeared for the respondent No. 2 even though this case was taken up in the revised list on 19.9.2005 and the judgment was reserved. 3. Petitioner is a company duly incorporated...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhagwan Prasad Agrawal vs Cit & Anr.
Judges:
14 December, 2005·5. Sri Piyush Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is entitled to get interest for the aforesaid period on the aforesaid amount Rs. 31,060 and that section 132B(4) of the Act operates in different fields. Elaborating the argument it was submitted that section 244...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.