Akash Chaturvedi S/O Shri Radhe ... vs State Of U.P. Through Its ...
Judges: V Shukla
19 December, 2005·3. Counter affidavit has been filed and therein it has been sought to be contended that application was moved before the Deputy Labour Commissioner by the petitioner and 42 others claiming an amount of Rs. 2700/- as earned wages for the period starting 01.01.2005 to 31.01.2005. It has been contended...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Naushad Ahmad Son Of Afzal Ahmad ... vs State Of U.P., Through Collector, ...
Judges: V Saran
19 December, 2005·1. An agricultural piece of land, measuring 0.858 hectares, from Khasra No. 445, situate in village Dara Ali, District Saharanpur was purchased by the petitioners jointly for a sum of Rs. 6.5 lacs. The sale deed was executed on 18.11.2002, on which the requisite stamp duty of Rs. 65,000/- had been p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Younus S/O Alimuddin, Mohd. ... vs State
Judges: R Rastogi
16 December, 2005·3. On the basis of the above report a case under Sections 353, 504 and 506 I.P.C was registered against them and after investigation the police submitted a chargesheet against the accused persons. The accused were charged under Sections 353 and 506 I.P.C. They pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. vs Rajpal Son Of Rhobi Ram
Judges: M Jain, V Prasad
16 December, 2005·5. The defence of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. was that of denial. 6. The trial court after examining the evidences, facts and circumstances of the case came to the conclusion that the charge under Section 302 LP.C. against the accused was not proved and he was entitled to acquittal. It hel...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Commissioner, Trade Tax vs The Cooperative Co. Ltd.
Judges: R Kumar
16 December, 2005·4. The Tribunal up held the order of the First Appellate Authority relying upon the decision of this Court in the case of Dyer Meakin Breweries v. Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P. reported in STC 1972 (29) page 69 and the decision of Apex Court in the case of United Breweries Ltd. v. State of Andhra ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mishri Lal S/O Shri K. Ram And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through ...
Judges: V Sahai, B Zaidi
16 December, 2005·4. Respondent No. 3, C.M.D. Chairman B.S.N.L. subsequently on 1.10.2005 framed another Rules for promotion, which are Annexure -3 on the record ( hereinafter called the New Rules) and which prescribe an examination for promotion for the post of 'Rajbhasa Adhikari', a new name given, to the post of A...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. Virendra Kumar Singh Son Of Sri ... vs Vice Chancellor, Mahatama ...
Judges: V Sahai, B A Zaidi
16 December, 2005·3. The petitioner says that he is entitled to work as a Lecturer and receive his salary. His services cannot come to an end. The appointment of respondent No. 4 is illegal and she cannot be permitted to work on the post of Lecturer in Botany and with these prayers, he has come up before us by filing...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashok Kumar S/O Ram Murat vs D.I.G. C.R.P.F. And Ors.
Judges: S R Alam, S Agarwal
16 December, 2005·8. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 9. The first question to be decided is whether appellant furnished any false or suppressed information in his verification Form. He claimed that at the time of appointment or submitting verification Form he was not aware of the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Commissioner, Sales Tax vs S/S Modi Industries Ltd.
Judges: R Kumar
16 December, 2005·3. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submitted that the Cinder Ash was not a coal and was liable to tax as an unclassified item while it had been treated as coal and held taxable @ 4%. In support of his contention, he relied upon the decision of this Court in the cas...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandra Prakash Gupta Son Of Late ... vs Nideshak (Kshetriya Gramin Bank) ...
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
16 December, 2005·8. In the said case, the representative of the employer though was not a legal practitioner but was a legally trained prosecutor. The Hon'ble Supreme Court came to the conclusion that as the employer's case was handled by the trained prosecutor, the delinquent should have been allowed to be represen...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.