Har Gyan Singh Son Of Pooran Singh vs State Of U.P. Through Home ...
Judges: V Saran
08 December, 2005·1. The petitioner was granted an arms licence in the year 2000. Thereafter on 12.6.2002 a First information Report under Section 307, 504, 506 I.P.C. was lodged against the petitioner. Another case under Section 107/116 Cr.P.C. was also registered against the petitioner. On 7.6.2003, the respondent ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Radhey Shyam Son Of Ganga Prasad ... vs State
Judges: M Prasad
08 December, 2005·3. Corrosive burn 4 cm. x 3 cm. on right side chest. 4. Corrosive burn in mid line (neck to lower end vertebral Column left scapula and upper half of back eye side and multiple spot all over the back. 6. The injured was admitted in the hospital and was discharged on 13.12.1978 and was kept under obs...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Subharati K.K.B. Charitable ... vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ...
Judges: V Saran
08 December, 2005·10. On 9.7.2004, a Government Order was issued, which related to the admissions of students, for the session 2004-05, in the three private medical colleges of the State of U.P. (which included the petitioner-Medical College). In the said G.O. it was specified that for the session 2004-05, the studen...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
K. Prasad Son Of Sri Chhatar Singh vs State Of U.P. Through Its ...
Judges: S Agarwal
07 December, 2005·5. The question as to whether the appointment on a post in State can be made without advertising the vacancies and inviting application from public at large came up for consideration before the Apex Court in a catena of cases. 6. In Ashok Kumar and Ors. v. Chairman, Banking Service recruitment Board...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Sunita Bhadooria D/O Late ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
07 December, 2005·7. In view of the above, the petition does not deserve to be decided. However, even if it is presumed that the 1974 Rules have been adopted, the Court has to examine the purpose of framing of the said Rules, as is evident from the title of the Rules 1974. This is applicable only in the case of the d...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahesh Kumar S/O Late Sri Gokul ... vs The State Of U.P. Through ...
Judges: A Tandon
07 December, 2005·2. The result of the said selections was not declared, therefore the petitioner approach this Court by means of writ petition no, 55341/03. The writ petition s6 filed by the petitioner was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation and the Commissioner Allahabad in turn was ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Chandra vs Kalyan Singh And Ors.
Judges: P Srivastava
07 December, 2005·2. The orders dated 23.11.2005 and 26.7.2004 passed in execution proceedings are challenged in the Present writ petition. The petitioner is defendant/judgment debtor. The respondent/decree-holders filed a suit No. 46 of 1993 in the court of Civil Judge, Bulandshahar for specific performance of agree...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. vs Amin Uddin S/O Iftikharuddin And ...
Judges: M Jain, M Chaudhary
07 December, 2005·2. Multiple gun shot wounds dispersed on left deltoid region left Upper arm top of left shoulder region, each measuring 0.2 cm x 0.2 cm but no tattooing or blackening present. Dispersal about 1.2 cm apart. 3. Left canine tooth broken. The doctor opined that all the injuries were caused by firearm an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Babu Singh, Khem Karan And Chob ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: M Jain, M Chaudhary
07 December, 2005·5. Medical examination of injured Saleem revealed below noted injuries on his person: 1. Lacerated wound 4 cm x 1 cm x skin deep on lateral side of left index finger. Wound is on the whole length of finger. Blackening present around the wound. Bleeding present on cleaning of wound. 2. Lacerated woun...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nisar Ahmad S/O Faizullah vs Registrar/Inspector Arabi, ...
Judges: A Sahi
07 December, 2005·5. In reply Sri Wasim Alam has urged that the respondent No. 5 possesses the qualification and there is absolutely no deficiency in the same and that the impugned order records clear finding in favour of the respondent No. 5 which has not been successfully impeached by the petitioner on any legal gr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.