Smt. Kesari Devi W/O Shri Gulab ... vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ...
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
18 August, 2005·5. Inquiry officer.- Where the State Government is of the opinion, on the basis of the report referred to in sub-rule (2) of Rule 4, that an inquiry should be held against a Pramukh or Up-Pramukh under Section 16 or against an Adhyaksha or Upadhyaksha under Section 29, it shall, by an order, appoint...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Meerut Development Authority, ... vs Surendra Kumar (Contractor) Son ...
Judges: D Singh
18 August, 2005·2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. The petitioner Development Authority entered into an agreement dated 26.12.1979 for construction of a Panchayat Bhawan at Qaiserganj, Meerut. A dispute arose between the parties and on the basis of the agreement an Arbitrator was appointed vide order date...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. vs Kedar Bharti And Kumar Bharti Sons ...
Judges: M Jain, M Chaudhary
18 August, 2005·6. Lalta had sustained 9 injuries out of which one lacerated wound (injury no.2) was on the left side of forehead and the rest were contusions. All had been caused by some blunt object and were fresh. All the injuries were simple except injuries no. 2 and 5 which were kept under observation. There w...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. vs Bashisht Rai Son Of Deonath Rai And ...
Judges: M Jain, M Chaudhary
17 August, 2005·8. During investigation, the Investigating Officer took in possession the blood stained Saree, Petticoat, Blouse and brassiere of Bijula Devi PW 4 in the presence of Deep Narain Rai PW 3 and Singhasan Rai. They were immediately sealed with the preparation of Fard. He also inspected the torch of Biju...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Pushpa Devi vs Hari Mohan Varma And Ors.
Judges: A Kumar
17 August, 2005·2. By means of present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-landlady challenges the order dated 11th February, 2003, passed by the trial court in S.C.C. Suit No. 9 of 1997 as well as order dated 4th November, 2004, passed by the revisional court in S.C.C. Revi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pavitra Kumar Garg vs Addl. District Judge And Ors.
Judges: A Kumar
17 August, 2005·2. These three petitioners-tenants, by means of present writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, have challenged the order dated 13th August, 2002, passed by the prescribed authority under Section 21(1)(a) of the U. P. Act No. XIII of 1972 (In short 'the Act') and the order dat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nanak Chandra, Pad Accounts Clerk vs Sri Vinay Kumar Srivastava, ...
Judges: S Mehrotra
17 August, 2005·4. It was held in the said award that the services of the petitioner-applicant had not been legally terminated, and he was deemed to be continuously in service. It was further directed that the petitioner-applicant be reinstated with full back wages since date of termination of his services. 5. It f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shramdeep Apartments Avas Samiti vs Navin Kumar Garg
Judges: A Varma
17 August, 2005·2. The submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is that the copy of the aforesaid order was served on opposite party on 1.8.2005, who in exercise of powers conferred under Section 29(5) of the U.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1965, (hereinafter to be referred to as 'Act'), on 6.8.2005, ap...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abhinav Chaturvedi Son Of Shri ... vs Mangalik Chemicals Through Its ...
Judges: R Deepak
17 August, 2005·2. Heard S/Sri V.M. Zaidi, Anil Bhushan, Gautam Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri V.P. Srivastava, Seem a Agarwal, Mayank Agarwal, learned counsel for the respondent concerned, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The issuance of cheque of a sum of Rs. 6,09,99.31 ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagdamba Prasad Pathak S/O Ram ... vs Sri Sanjeev Kumar Agarwal ...
Judges: S Mehrotra
17 August, 2005·2. I have heard Sri Naval Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner-applicant, and perused the record. 3. It is evident from a perusal of the averments made in the Contempt Petition and the Affidavit accompanying the Contempt Petition including the said order dated 10th May, 2004 that the said order...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.