Vijay Singh Son Of Shri Manmohan ... vs Rani Laxmi Bai Kshetriya Grameen ...
Judges: R Tiwari
23 August, 2005·1. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The facts of the writ petition are that the father of the petitioner, i.e., Sri Man Mohan Singh died in harness on 8.9.2003 from the post of Driver-cum-Messenger in the Grameen Bank at Babina under the respondents. The petitioner submitted ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sanjay Tiwari Son Of Shri Shyam ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through The ...
Judges: A Tandon
23 August, 2005·(C) in making an order under clause (a), the State Government may direct that any person who wilfully acts in a manner intended to contravene, or defeat the purposes of the order shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term not exceeding three months or with fine not exceeding one thousand rupee...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hamiduddin Son Of Salahuddin vs State Of U.P. Through Ministry Of ...
Judges: S Ambwani
22 August, 2005·3. Brief facts giving rise to this petition are, that the petitioner was appointed as a L.T. Grade teacher in a Government College on 24.2.1966. He retired as the Principal of Basic Teachers Training College Varanasi on 31.3.2000. Her was recommended for state teacher's award of the year 1999. By th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Magghu Prasad Tiwari Son Of Sri ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through The ...
Judges: S Ambwani
22 August, 2005·"7 Analysing facts and arguments in the case, we find that the scale of Rs. 2000-3200 is clearly a part of the BCR scheme 10% of the post in 1600-2660 are placed in the scale of 2000-3200. It appears that BCR provided for this since those coming under BCR would hardly have any opportunity to go to t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: Juggilal Kamlapat Holding ... vs Unknown
Judges: S Ambwani
22 August, 2005·"RESOLVED that the scheme of amalgamation of J.K. Investment Ltd. and Kanpur Investments Ltd. with Juggilal Kamlapat Holding Ltd., which was circulated to the members along with the notice of the meeting and a copy of which has also been placed before this meeting and signed for identification by th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sachin Kumar S/O Sri Indrapal, ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: S Ambwani
22 August, 2005·The recruitment of Class IV employees is regulated by the U.P. Subordinate Civil Courts Inferior Establishment Rules, 1955 made under the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India in consultation with the High Court. The District Judge is the appointing authority of all the class III and I...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shri Kant Arya Son Of Shiv Prasad ... vs New Victoria Mills Unit Of ...
Judges: V Saran
22 August, 2005·5. The facts as narrated above are not disputed by the parties. The contention of Sri Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, is that since the offer made by the petitioner was always a conditional offer which had not been fulfilled by the respondents, and the said offer had been withdrawn by ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Acharya Narad Muni Trigunayat Son ... vs District Inspector Of Schools And ...
Judges: S Ambwani
22 August, 2005·3. It is contended that the Chairman of Nagar Palika Parishad did not want the petitioner to serve as Officiating Principal Audit of the school accounts was carried out in the School by Sthaniya Nidhi Lekha Pariksha, Kanpur Region, Kanpuri of the financial year 2004. In the audit inspection, certain...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Regional Joint Director Of ... vs Smt. Raju V. John And Anr.
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
22 August, 2005·7. Sri Anil Bhushan, learned Counsel for the appellants, however, vehemently supported the judgment under appeal and contended that the findings recorded by the learned Judge do not call for any interference in the Special Appeal. 8. We have carefully considered the submissions advanced by the learn...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Avneet Singh S/O Sri Yashveer ... vs State Of U.P. Through (D.M.) And ...
Judges: A Saran
22 August, 2005·2. The grounds for challenging the said proceedings and order were that as a matter of fact the applicant had made payment on different dates in respect of the bounced cheque. This contention is mentioned in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the applicant's application. Whether the applicant has or has not made...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.