Naubat Son Of Late Shankar, Dhan ... vs Deputy Director Of ...
Judges: S Srivastava
30 August, 2005·5. Learned counsels for the Caveator-Opp. Parties urged that they do not propose to file any counter affidavit to the writ petition. 6. Considered materials on record and arguments of learned counsel for the parties. 7. It transpires from the record that Appeal No. 335/1271 and Appeal No. 407/1337 o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. vs Mala Singh S/O Jakar Singh And Gur ...
Judges: M Jain, M Chaudhary
30 August, 2005·3. The prosecution case, in brief, was that Harnam Singh deceased was prosecuted for the murder of one Bachan Singh-brother of Mala Singh and Darshan Singh accused. Harnam Singh was convicted and had undergone the imprisonment. One Kartar Singh was also an accused in that case but he was acquitted i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
B.D. Agarwal And Company vs Commissioner Of Sales Tax
Judges: P Krishna
29 August, 2005·4. Sri Shubham Agarwal, learned Counsel for the applicant mainly submitted three points in support of the revision. Challenging the levy of purchase tax on the purchase of "reta" and "bajri" from unregistered dealer under Section 3-AAAA of the Act, it was submitted that sand and "bajri" having been ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The U.P. Stock Exchange ... vs Vegepro Foods And Feeds Ltd.
Judges: S Ambwani
29 August, 2005·2. A counter affidavit has been filed stating that a reference was made to the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) under Section 15(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (in short, the Act of 1985) on 13.10.2003, and that the respondent company was d...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kamal Krishna S/O Late Jai Bhagwan vs State Of U.P., Tajendra Kumar @ ...
Judges: M Mittal
29 August, 2005·3. Brief facts of the case are that Komal Krishna, the applicant filed a complaint against Tajendra, Ashwani and Surendra Kumar under Sections 307, 504, 506 and 452 IPC alleging that he was married to Seema Rani daughter of accused Surendra Kumar. Ashwani is son of Surendra Kumar and Tajendra is the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Madhan Mohan Srivastava Son Of ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...
Judges: T Agarwala
29 August, 2005·7. From the aforesaid, it is clear that the appointing authority is the Collector. However, Rule 19-A stipulates as under : " 19-A, Appointing Authority- Subject to the provisions of Article 311 of the Constitution, the Sub-Divisional Officer shall be the appointing authority: Provided that in respe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Vidyawati Widow Of Late ... vs State Of U.P. And Ram Bilas Alias ...
Judges: M Mittal
29 August, 2005·2. I have heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the complainant, learned A.G.A and perused the record. 3. Applicants case is that their predecessor in interest Panneshwari Lal was recorded Bhumidhar of Khata No. 108 consisting of plot no. 100,250,308 and 310 situate in villag...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Devendra Kumar Mishra vs Ramendra Kumar And Ors.
Judges: N Mehrotra
29 August, 2005·10. Besides the above, I find that there is a provision of appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure against an order refusing the permissions to file a suit under Section 96 C.P.C. but there is no provision of appeal if the competent court accords the permission to file suit under Sect...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jay Prakash S/O Saktu Singh @ ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: I Murtaza, A Saran
29 August, 2005·13. PW 4, Ved Prakash, who is a nephew by relation of the informant Ramvir and also a resident of village Habibpur Nagla deposed that Ramvir's daughter Guddi was married to Jai Prakash about 3 years back. He learnt in the morning in his village that Jay Prakash had murdered Guddi and his children wi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raja Ram Son Of Ganga Prasad vs The State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: P Srivastava
25 August, 2005·1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This application has been filed challenging the order dated 21.4.2005 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Basti on an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., Raja Ram v. Tilak Ram and Ors., which was co...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.